Financial Times FT.com

Pre-Budget report 2009

Other sections

Resources

Darling dodges demands for detail on cuts

The UK chancellor refuses to disclose the extent of planned spending cuts across government departments, undermining the pre-Budget report’s claims of increased transparency

Myners dismisses City ‘supertax’ fears

Minister tells bankers to blame employers

Tax system flaws cost UK £40bn a year

HMRC estimate likely to inflame deficit debate

Backlash over banker supertax grows

Bonus levy labelled an ’embarrassment’

Inquest opens into Darling’s statement

Ministers puzzled by PBR anger

Related content and features

Video


More FT video

Pre-Budget report 2009: COMMENT & ANALYSIS

Prevarication and Newspeak will not fix our finances

Willem Buiter

The government’s unwillingness to tackle a rising debt burden will raise the risk premium on UK public debt, writes Willem Buiter

Darling route to austerity still shrouded in fog

Chancellor took refuge in claiming it would be unwise to set out detailed plans, rather than explain spending priorities and what savings would be generated in the medium term. This is hard to swallow

Populism without purpose

Dividing lines are all Gordon Brown’s government has left. It has run out of ideas save arguing that David Cameron’s Conservatives would be worse, writes Philip Stephens

Read his lips: more new taxes

The jibe against Labour chancellors is that they always run out of money. The twist provided by Alistair Darling is that having run out of money, he plans to go on spending, writes Jonathan Guthrie

Bankers will follow the money

Gillian Tett

Reasons exist to think London’s role in global finance is being undermined but that reflects more than the bonus news, writes Gillian Tett

Darling’s bonus bingo gambles with the City’s future

Lombard

Alistair Darling’s Robin Hood measures to curb bankers’ bonuses will sharpen the brutal meritocracy of the 2009-10 bonus season, for bankers, banks and for the UK as a banking centre

The most important argument in UK politics has not begun

The drama of the PBR announcements reflects the current political pressure, but did not open discussions about what the two parties want for the future of Britain, writes Chris Cook

Needed: a clear plan for cutting the deficit

The chancellor’s speech was less an act of populist electioneering than might have been feared, but failed to set out where exactly the cuts will come – especially if growth proves slower than predicted, writes Martin Sandbu

More pre-Budget report articles

PBR makes little difference on public spending

Politics more evident than economics

Investors take fright at ‘fiscal fiction’

Investors take fright at ‘fiscal fiction’

Chancellor accused of sleight of hand

Opposition attacks report’s ‘smoke and mirrors’

Banks look to absorb supertax cost

Banks nervous about cutting City staff bonuses

Lawyers search for loopholes in supertax

Banks try to escape 50% levy

Investors raise queries about credibility

Government bonds see big sell-off

Revenue to clarify bonus rules

Treasury backs off fund managers

Tobin tax remains Treasury ambition

Financial transactions levy still on agenda

Axe set to fall on public sector budgets

Austerity amid cuts of up to 20% forecast

NHS hospitals face four-year spending squeeze

Burnham says aim is to improve efficiency

Tax system grows more complicated

Drive for simplification of system backfires

Darling defends economic forecasts

Chancellor criticised for failing to tackle budget deficit

Osborne pledges to reverse NIC rise

Top Conservative priority on taxes

‘What banker wants to be in the UK?’

Tax move on bonuses will affect 20,000 bankers

Careful formula falls between two stools

Darling manages to find something to annoy everyone

Are plans a fiscal elixir or bad medicine?

Will government ideas work?

Top bankers’ bonus rate to top 100%

New focus on taxing the rich

Tax dodgers face fresh Treasury clampdown

The chancellor cracks down on evasion and avoidance

Business angry at NIC increase

Extra jobs tax is ‘madness’

Darling misses goalposts of credibility

Lack of detail on public spending