TECHNOLOGY
Breadcrumb trail navigation:
- FT Home
- > Companies
- > Technology
- > New Technology Policy Forum
Resources
Principal content

Exclusively to FT.com, James Boyle, Richard Epstein, Thomas Hazlett and Eli Noam debate the regulatory and legal issues generated by - and also shaping - the high-tech industries. You can learn more about the contributors here on FT.com
Comment on a New Technology Policy Forum column - -
Net neutrality at the crossroads
The FCC should steer clear of the pricing swamp needed to figure out what speed preferences are allowed at what cost differential
Goodbye, Macroeconomics
Industrial age solutions can’t fix information age economic problems, writes Eli Noam
The broadband numbers racket
Cherry picking broadband penetration numbers to imply the US is slipping into Third World status is fine for a quickie term paper, but adults ought sort through the multi-dimensional complexity of the real world, writes Thomas Hazlett
Dissociated Press
To preserve quality news, we need a plan that knits together business models and not-for-profit initiatives, writes James Boyle
Will the Supreme Court stem the antipatent tide?
Reflections on In re Bilski from Richard Epstein
Coming soon: mobile, immersive, interactive entertainment
In the future mobile devices will be not just an undersized screen, but as an extraordinarily powerful connection point to a new style of video media, writes Eli Noam
A letter to the new FCC chair, Mr Julius Genachowski
I get $3bn. America gets its TV spectrum back. It’s an offer you can’t refuse.
Obama in cyberspace
What does the president’s mixture of principle and pragmatism look like in the world of the new economy, and more specifically, the world of intellectual property policy? The picture is mixed, writes James Boyle
The European Commission strikes again
In pursuing Intel, the EC has undertaken costly proceedings that don’t produce any clear social gain, writes Richard Epstein
Separating telecoms?
Separation is a tool, not a goal. There are other tools to achieve the same legitimate objectives, and they would be simpler and cheaper, writes Eli Noam




