The nature of business
Are organizations in Asia waking up to the risks of climate change and a biodiversity crisis?
Covid-19 is placing our relationship with the planet under intense scrutiny. Business leaders are now asking themselves just how ready they are to tackle a growing climate crisis.
New research commissioned by MS&AD and conducted by Longitude, a Financial Times company, surveyed 541 organizations across Asia to find out about their sustainability strategies, hear their views on biodiversity and learn how they are facing up to the risks of an unhealthy planet.
The results show that awareness of climate risks is growing and action is underway. But they also show that a coordinated response will take time.
Policymakers and organizations continue to set ambitious climate targets, so businesses have a lot to do. Acknowledging the scale of the task is the first step.
Material risks now loom larger
Sustainability is a critical management issue for the majority of companies, and Covid-19 has increased their sense of urgency.
More than eight in 10 organizations (83%) say they are more aware that environmental degradation makes
pandemics more likely.
A similar number (81%) know they will need new skills to improve how they track potential risks. Asked about the greatest material risks to their businesses, they point to the quality of air and water. But with a loss of biodiversity and extreme weather events also a concern, an integrated response to these threats is needed.
We need to tackle the health of the planet, which is interlinked and interdependent with the health of people, society and the economy.
Air and water are seen as the biggest risks to companies
Covid-19 has made the unthinkable, thinkable. If all this could happen with a pandemic, what about all those warnings about the impact of climate change?
Efficiency drives sustainability strategies
For many organizations, their approach to sustainability is guided by common global language and goals, such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
The research, meanwhile, shows that three things drive them the most:
- The need to reduce waste and increase efficiency
- Increased awareness of environmental risks
- Increasing the long-term viability of their business.
So sustainability has to be meaningful to their organization.
Efficiency pushes businesses to pursue sustainability
Businesses move toward sustainability
Setting strategies and targets is achievable, but translating them into practical techniques to achieve those goals is much tougher.
For many organizations, this is a work in progress. Just a quarter say that their sustainability
strategy has been fully implemented and communicated to key stakeholders.
What is stopping the others?
Shortfalls in resources and skills are slowing down progress
Next comes natural capital and biodiversity
Organizations are starting to develop natural capital and biodiversity strategies in order to reduce their damage to the environment and natural habitats – and to protect their business from emerging risks.
These are good intentions, but that does not mean they are making them a reality. Half of organizations say they have developed a natural capital strategy, and 42% are working on one. Only 7% have a fully scoped and implemented natural capital strategy.
“There is a perception that natural capital thinking is a very complex technical area, which can put organizations off. It gets labeled as too hard, and the conclusion is often that it is easier not to do it,” says Rosie Dunscombe, technical director of the Capitals Coalition. “But it is better to do something than nothing. Organizations that proactively make the investment before their hands are forced will realize broad benefits.”
Raw materials and the health of their people are businesses’ greatest concerns about biodiversity loss
“Our organization needs to increase the awareness of the potential impact of biodiversity risks”
“Our business does not have a good track record of taking biodiversity into account when making strategic decisions”
Data raises awareness of our ties to nature
Covid-19 has helped us to understand the link between the destruction of habitats and infectious disease. And smart use of data and technology can have a transformative effect on how we use natural and man-made resources.
“The first thing we need to do is to understand market impacts on nature,” says Niki Mardas of Global Canopy, a not-for-profit thinktank that focuses on nature-positive investments. “Transparency is not the be-all and end-all, but without understanding how we are connected to these impacts, we cannot begin to have accountability for them, and we cannot begin to solve them.”
In partnership with the Stockholm Environment Institute, Global Canopy has developed the trase.earth platform to understand these connections. The platform uses big data, including shipping records, to help organizations understand their exposure to deforestation-risk in their supply chains.
We combine the data and experience we have in the insurance industry with expertise in AI, analytics and IoT to come up with new ways to address social challenges.
The importance of being able to predict and pre-empt threats is one of the reasons why MS&AD, through MS&AD Ventures, has invested in 40 technology start-ups over the past two years and encourages open innovation between industry, government and academia.
“We need to recruit new skills/expertise to enhance our risk impact reporting”
“We support ‘green recovery’ plans in order to create a low-carbon society in the wake of Covid-19”
“Climate-related risks are interconnected with other risks faced by our organization and need to be treated as such”