Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. The collective performance of pro-Remain parties in European election opinion polls is proving remarkably sound
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. The collective performance of pro-Remain parties in European election opinion polls is proving remarkably sound © PA

Nigel Farage is making most of the noise in the European elections thus far. But we shouldn’t lose sight of the progress being made by the parties that are firmly committed to a second referendum or remain.

I said last week that these pro-Remain parties (Liberal Democrats, Green party, Change UK, Scottish National party, Plaid Cymru) had lost some momentum by not fighting on a common platform. Even so, their collective performance in opinion polls is still proving remarkably sound.

Take a look at the YouGov poll published on Monday. This puts Mr Farage’s Brexit party on 34 per cent of the vote. But then add up the scores for the pro-Remain parties. The Lib Dems are on 15, the SNP on 3, Plaid Cymru on 1, Greens on 11 and Change UK on 5.

Taken together that puts the pro-Remain parties on a total of 35 per cent, 1 point ahead of Mr Farage’s party.

Because all the pro-Remain parties are running separately, this will not translate into nearly as many European Parliament seats as the Farageists will win. Still, the total votes cast for parties that want remain and a second referendum appears to be growing.

All this, of course, puts Labour on the spot. If Jeremy Corbyn’s party (currently on 16 per cent) were to make a solid commitment to a second Brexit referendum, then support for a confirmatory vote would be well over 50 per cent — allowing the People’s Vote movement to claim a clear victory.

But Labour is muddled over whether to advocate a second referendum and remain. On Monday Tom Watson declared that Labour was “a Remain and reform party”. But Barry Gardiner, the shadow international trade secretary, has said “Labour is not a Remain party now”.

As for Mr Corbyn, he came up last week with the impenetrable statement: “We are not trying to win the votes of just leavers, or just remainers. Instead we’re reaching out to everyone. Labour will never be the party of the 52% or the 48%.”

As Polly Toynbee writes in Monday’s Guardian: “What a useless voting guide that is for more than two-thirds of Labour voters and almost all Labour members who want to vote remain.”

Labour is now paying for this confusion. As they prepare to go to the ballot box, many of these pro-Remain Labour voters face a stark choice: do they stick with Labour’s muddled position on Brexit or do they cast a clear vote for Remain by voting for the Lib Dems and others?

According to Labour MP Ben Bradshaw, the YouGov poll shows that about 48 per cent of traditional Labour voters are preparing to vote for parties that are firmly pro-Remain and pro-second referendum.

If that kind of shift is truly realised at the polls, Mr Corbyn will have a real problem on his hands.

Keep up with what's happening in the EU by signing up to our Brussels Briefing newsletter

Further reading

Theresa May serves no one by clinging on to power

“ . . . by all objective measures Mrs May ceased to be prime minister some time ago. Hers is now a purposeless premiership that endured only because her party feared what came next. Increasingly her MPs are more afraid of the stasis. Having promised to go once a withdrawal agreement is in place, Mrs May faces her own no-deal exit.” (Robert Shrimsley, FT)

European elections: how vote could help predict the outcome of a second Brexit referendum

“The ability to test which areas of the country currently have the highest levels of relative enthusiasm — measured in turnout — will provide a useful indication of which voters would show up in another national poll on EU membership.” (Anand Menon and Alan Wager, The UK in a Changing Europe)

Hard numbers

Is the rise in UK business investment a turning point? Read more

A graphic with no description

Get alerts on Brexit when a new story is published

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2020. All rights reserved.
Reuse this content (opens in new window)

Commenting on this article is temporarily unavailable while we migrate to our new comments system.

Note that this only affects articles published before 28th October 2019.

Follow the topics in this article