Vista: the gathering storm

Relations between Microsoft and the European Commission are a bit like the weather in Brussels: sometimes better, sometimes worse, but on the whole and viewed over the year, pretty appalling.

Right now, the two sides are going through an especially dark and turbulent phase. Over the past week or so there have been public accusations, charges of foul-play, denials and other hostile activity, culminating with a harshly-worded letter by Neelie Kroes that was published in the Financial Times on Tuesday.

The trouble has all to do with Vista, Microsoft’s new personal computer operating system that is set to replace Windows at the end of this year. The Commission has voiced deep concerns, warning Microsoft repeatedly that the new system may fall foul of European competition rules.

The company is understandably keen to resolve any difficulties before the launch. The Commission is - equally understandably - unable to provide Microsoft with a carte blanche before it has sifted through all the complaints by rivals, and the complex technical and legal issues thrown up by the system. Besides, Brussels argues, it is not the Commission’s job to help Microsoft design a product that complies with EU law.

What has angered Ms Kroes is that Microsoft has cranked up the PR machine, proclaiming through a variety of sources that the Commission’s actions will harm European retailers, businesses and the economy as a whole. Last week, it even made a brave attempt to link Vista’s launch with employment growth in the EU.

Judging by Ms Kroes’ letter - in which she denounced the recent “co-ordinated campaign” - those efforts have rather backfired. Officials say the commissioner has been personally annoyed by what she sees as a clumsy attempt to pressurise Brussels.

Given that the Commission has already fined Microsoft some €780m over the past two years for violating competition rules, further acrimony is not what Microsoft needs. The worry must indeed be that the recent flare-up over Vista will spill over into the group’s other battle with the Commission over Microsoft’s compliance with an earlier Brussels ruling.

The Commission will shortly decide whether Microsoft has at last complied with a landmark 2004 antitrust ruling (in July it ruled that it hadn’t). If Brussels finds that Microsoft has still not implemented the orders contained in that decision, the group is certain to face fresh punishment worth hundreds of millions of euros.

Increasingly, it seems that there is only one hope for Microsoft to end its regulatory nightmare in Europe. That hope resides in Luxembourg, where the European Court of First Instance is examining Microsoft’s appeal against the March 2004 decision, which forms the basis both for the compliance battle but also for any new fight over Vista.

If the judges overturn the Commission ruling, all the regulator’s past and present efforts are likely to crumble to dust. If not, Microsoft may rue the day it angered the woman at the helm of the Brussels competition watchdog.

Tobias Buck

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2016. All rights reserved. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.

More on this topic

Suggestions below based on Blogs

Europe’s banks need consolidation to find stability

European central bankers and supervisors have recently called for greater consolidation of the banking system, in particular in the eurozone, and for accelerating the capital market union project proposed by the European Commission.

Men without work

Over the weekend, the FT published my review of Nicholas Eberstadt’s important new book Men Without Work. The core message is captured in the graph below.

Clicking fingers will not be enough for Brexit to work

Imagine a British politician in a friendly restaurant somewhere on the continent. He or she decides what they want from a menu that is conveniently also in English. They summon the attentive waiter or waitress, who in an obliging and smiley manner takes the British politician’s order. That is, of course, given in English. Everybody nods happily.

US energy – does it matter who is president?

Is it mad or deeply cynical to say that the outcome of the US presidential election doesn’t really matter for the energy sector? Surely there are big differences of belief between the two candidates, reflected in their stated policy positions? Surely their supporters are giving their votes and money to bring about changes they believe in? True, but if you take a step back from the noise and fury of the campaign it is worth asking whether the sector will be very different in 2025 if Hillary Clinton prevails or if the recent drift in the polls continues and President Donald Trump is inaugurated on January 20.