Experimental feature

Listen to this article

Experimental feature

For months, the best banks could hope for was to survive on life support until they woke up in a nightmarish world of intrusive regulation. And here it is. The Turner review, an attempt by the UK’s Financial Services Authority to explain how it intends to make banking safe for society after the worst financial crisis in a century, is a call to co-ordinated action to regulators round the world. Much of it is unarguable. The banking system must operate with more and higher quality capital, with the amount set against casino-like trading bets raised as much as threefold. The future world of banking will be one of lower average return on equity, but significantly lower risk to shareholders and depositors.

Equally sensible is a proposal for a new capital adequacy framework that offsets the pro-cyclicality of Basel II with counter-cyclical provisions parked in a new “economic cycle reserve”. Introducing capital buffers that expand in economic upswings and shrink in recessions should allow the system to absorb economic shocks rather than amplify them. As a backstop, the FSA also proposes to subject bank capital adequacy to a common sense test in the form of a maximum gross leverage ratio, similar to a scheme Switzerland recently introduced to encourage rapid downsizing of the large trading books of its universal banks.

The FSA has done well to warn hotheads against the superficial appeal of barring “utility” banks from “investment banking” activities: large, complex banks spanning a wide range of activities must remain a feature of a globalised trading and financial system. Given the political hysteria over pay, its statement that poorly structured bonuses were “considerably less important” in provoking the crisis than inadequate approaches to capital, accounting and liquidity is commendably honest. Targeting pay excesses indirectly is also sensible. The stiff increase in capital required for trading activity will do more to moderate pay than micromanaging remuneration ever will.

To e-mail the Lex team confidentially click here
To post public comments click here

The Lex column is now on Twitter. To receive our daily line-up and links to Lex notes via Twitter, click here


Lex is the FT’s agenda-setting column, giving an authoritative view on corporate and financial matters. It is also one of the few parts of FT.com available only to Premium subscribers. This article is provided for free as an example. A Premium subscription gives you unlimited access to all FT content, including all Lex articles and the FT mobile Newsreader.

Subscribe now

If you have questions or comments, please e-mail help@ft.com or call:

US and Canada: +1 800 628 8088
Asia: +852 2905 5555
UK, Europe and rest of the world: +44 (0)20 7775 6248

Get alerts on Companies when a new story is published

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2018. All rights reserved.

Comments have not been enabled for this article.

Follow the topics in this article