Chinese leadership to reform gulags

Use of labour camps significantly reduced in recent months

Pu Zhiqiang has been hospitalised for three days to stabilise his blood sugar, but the prominent Chinese human rights lawyer is not slowing down. From his hospital bed, he is fighting for the abolition of laojiao – a Gulag-style “re-education through labour” system that could become the first major reform of China’s new leaders.

“The name of re-education through labour stinks, and it signals that China is a police state,” says Mr Pu. “What we need is to rebuild the rule of law.”

Among the many calls facing Xi Jinping, China’s new Communist party chief, for political reform, none is louder than the demand for changes to the laojiao system.

Recent signs suggest that Mr Pu and other critics of the decades-old system may emerge victorious. Last month, the Communist party said it would “push reform” of the labour camp system this year. And evidence is also mounting that authorities have significantly reduced the use of the camps in recent months.

“There is consensus at the top to abolish the system,” says Wang Gongyi, a recently retired senior justice department official who is China’s most prominent official labour camp expert. “The pressure has grown too big, and the police are the only ones that want to keep the camps.”

Demands to reform the judicial system have grown in recent years particularly after Hu Jintao, Mr Xi’s predecessor, granted greater powers to the domestic security apparatus in an attempt to contain unrest in an increasingly complex society.

This was highlighted in 2009 with the draconian 11-year jail sentence handed to Liu Xiaobo, the dissident who the following year won the Nobel Peace Prize, and by the almost three-month detention without charge of Ai Weiwei, China’s most prominent contemporary artist.

But laojiao – which allows police to detain people for up to four years without trial – is the most potent symbol of the hollowing out of China’s legal institutions. It was designed to silence political opponents in the 1950s, but has become a dumping ground for people who have fallen foul of the security services.

Government figures from 2009 put the number of labour camp inmates at 160,000. But Mr Wang says police stopped sending new prisoners a couple of months ago except for a minority accused of certain violent offences.

“The total number of inmates was down to about 50,000 at the end of last year, and if the current trend continues, there will be just 20,000 left by the end of this year,” adds Mr Wang.

These figures tally with observations of others familiar with individual camps. Liu Hua, a woman who was released late last year after two years in Masanjia, says no new inmates have arrived at the camp in northeast China since September 26. Another activist who keeps in contact with a network of female camp inmates says she has observed the same pattern across the country.

Mr Pu believes no inmates have arrived in camps in Chongqing since Bo Xilai, the former Communist party secretary of the western metropolis, was purged in April.

Abolishing laojiao would be a remarkable assertion of Mr Xi’s powers over the bloated security machine. But any effort could be helped by the fact that the top official for security issues no longer sits on the Politburo Standing Committee, a change that occurred when Mr Xi was appointed the new party boss in November.

From defence lawyers to judges, the whole Chinese legal establishment argues that laojiao is unconstitutional. Former inmates describe the camps as hellish places of excessive forced labour, torture and humiliation.

“Anyone who would speak would be punished by having to work while squatting,” says one former inmate of Tuanhe Farm, a camp just south of Beijing.

Inmates also recount frequent beatings with electric batons, pricking with needles from the sewing machines inmates use to make paramilitary uniforms, and solitary confinement in dark cells.

In the wake of the Bo scandal, activists argued that the excessive use of labour camps by Wang Lijun, the former Chongqing police chief, underscored the need to end the entire Gulag system.

Since last May, Mr Pu has helped secure the release of 21 inmates from camps in Chongqing. A typical case was that of Tian Hongyuan. In 2010, Mr Tian suggested to property owners in an online forum that they bring a dispute with the developer of their compound to the attention of Xi Jinping, then vice-president.

The police responded by interrogating and beating Mr Tian, and sending him to a labour camp. His case was widely followed on the Chinese internet, as his background as a white-collar worker and property owner, and the unpolitical nature of his comments, helped many members of China’s middle class to identify with him.

“The system has become local officials’ tool for personal revenge,” says Wang Gongyi.

The Communist party created laojiao in 1955 to control “counter-revolutionaries” – people whom it perceived as a threat but who could not be accused of any crime. The scope of the system was soon broadened to include anyone who fell out of favour during the party’s many political struggles.

After China initiated its market reforms in 1978, the camps’ focus changed to small offenders, including drug addicts and prostitutes. But as a growing income gap, official corruption and abuse of power swelled the ranks of the disaffected, the camps have been filling with people the party sees as a threat to its power.

Former inmates interviewed by the Financial Times say petitioners – people who complain to higher administrative levels about grievances the local government fails to address – formed the biggest group imprisoned in their camps. Between a quarter and half of the inmates were followers of Falun Gong, the outlawed sect, they added.

These numbers raise doubts about how far Beijing’s reform can go, given that they will still want to find a way to deal with such people.

“The question is what to do with these people?” says Mr Wang. “When the troublemakers start flooding the streets, police will be under pressure again to maintain stability. They will think of new ways.”

For now, experts say the camps are gradually being transformed into drug rehabilitation centres. The standing committee of the National People’s Congress, China’s rubber stamp parliament, is this year expected to issue an opinion abolishing the regulation governing the camps – which is when the real work starts.

“After that, we will need a large-scale overhaul of our criminal code,” says Mr Wang.

Whether that can really help usher in the rule of law in China remains to be seen.

“There is no other option,” says Mr Pu. “We still have all the same problems we had 10 years ago. Hu Jintao’s ‘harmonious society’ is in a dead end.”

Additional reporting by Zhao Tianqi

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2016. All rights reserved. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from and redistribute by email or post to the web.

More on this topic

Suggestions below based on China Politics & Policy

China: Speech breaks out

Responding to calls for greater freedom of speech could remove a vital pillar of the Communist party’s power