Listen to this article
The conventional wisdom is that Latvia, like all countries with pegged exchange rates, cannot devalue. If it did, the cost of its foreign currency borrowings would rocket and private borrowers would go bankrupt. Yet Latvia clearly also cannot continue as it is. The central bank is burning rapidly through reserves to defend the euro peg. Meanwhile, the economy is shrinking at a 20 per cent rate. Democracies, it is said, cannot tolerate such deflation – although Argentina’s economy shrank by two-thirds before abandoning its peg.
There may, however, be a way out of the impasse. Latvian consumers have borrowed about €17bn in euros, equivalent to 90 per cent of gross domestic product. Assume this was switched into lats, as research boutique Gavekal notes is allowed under law. Then say the lat devalued by 40 per cent. Swedish banks, Latvia’s biggest lenders, would suffer an immediate loss of €7bn. On the other hand, they could lose as much if there was no devaluation: after all, bad loans usually reach 35 per cent of total loans in emerging markets crises, Citigroup estimates. The Latvian government could also compensate the banks with bonds worth, say, half the loss. As Latvian public debt is only 20 per cent of GDP, Riga could afford this. The European Union could help with guarantees.
The result would be a faster recovery. Fewer bad loans also means banks would lose less money than if the crisis ground on. Latvians would meanwhile share the burden through higher taxes. One snag is if such a scheme tempted others to follow. Countries with pegged exchange rates, such as Estonia or Bulgaria, are possible copycats. In extremis, it might also interest fixed exchange rate economies painfully deflating within the eurozone. Irish sovereign debt, for example, was downgraded again yesterday because of its banks’ fast deteriorating assets.
The Lex column is now on Twitter. To receive our daily line-up and links to Lex notes via Twitter, click here
Lex is the FT’s agenda-setting column, giving an authoritative view on corporate and financial matters. It is also one of the few parts of FT.com available only to Premium subscribers. This article is provided for free as an example. A Premium subscription gives you unlimited access to all FT content, including all Lex articles and the FT mobile Newsreader.
If you have questions or comments, please e-mail email@example.com or call:
US and Canada: +1 800 628 8088
Asia: +852 2905 5555
UK, Europe and rest of the world: +44 (0)20 7775 6248