Experimental feature

Listen to this article

00:00
00:00
Experimental feature
or

When seized by a panic attack, focus on breathing slowly and deeply. In response to a frenzied sell-off, Lehman Brothers dragged forwards its third quarter earnings release, hoping to buy itself a little respiratory space. It should suck in oxygen quickly. The new strategy, perhaps by virtue of its rushed publication, is incomplete.

Plans to sell a majority stake in its investment management arm, spin off $25bn to $30bn of commercial real estate assets and reduce residential exposure further through a deal with Blackrock, remain just good intentions. Slashing the dividend to save $450m a year is at this point nothing more than a token gesture.

Even confirming these measures of last resort may not be enough to assuage investors’ palpable fears – after this week’s pummelling, the stock barely held flat on Wednesday.

The price of insuring the bank’s debt continued to rise. If Lehman secures a quick, well-priced sale of its asset management stake, it should generate a profit to offset the writedowns being taken against real estate assets to be spun off. The bidders, though, clearly have all the negotiating power.

The prospect of further writedowns, and the need to capitalise “Spin Co” to the satisfaction of the ratings agencies, means further capital raising cannot be ruled out. Lehman will be debt-financing the new entity, and it has its own rating to think about.

Lehman has reduced its real estate exposure and leverage, but not rapidly enough to suppress doubts about its viability. It now has perhaps six months to complete its reinvention.

As US financial stocks crashed again on Wednesday, that appears challenging. The management celebrates the revenue streams from the investment banking business hurt by real estate writedowns. But Lehman’s ball and chain is also its anchor as an independent company.

Once shorn of its property portfolio, the anodyne but solid “Clean Lehman” is primarily a streamlined, fixed-income franchise, just as it was in the late 1990s. Back then, of course, it was a perennial takeover candidate. It probably will be again.

To email the Lex team confidentially click here

OR

To post public comments click here

Lex is the FT’s agenda-setting column, giving an authoritative view on corporate and financial matters. It is also one of the few parts of FT.com available only to Premium subscribers. This article is provided for free as an example. A Premium subscription gives you unlimited access to all FT content, including all Lex articles and the FT mobile Newsreader.

Subscribe now

If you have questions or comments, please email help@ft.com or call:

US and Canada: +1 800 628 8088

Asia: +852 2905 5555

UK, Europe & Rest of the world: +44 (0)20 7775 6248

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2017. All rights reserved.
  1. new
myFT

Follow the topics mentioned in this article

Comments have not been enabled for this article.