Doubts cast over Treasury guarantee plan

The Bank of England questioned a Treasury-endorsed plan to guarantee mortgage-backed securities on Tuesday, arguing for better ways to revive home lending.

Mervyn King, governor, said he was un­convinced by Sir James Crosby’s proposal to extend about £100bn ($154bn) of guarantees if its purpose was to resurrect a “form of lending that for rather good reason has fallen out of favour”.

Alistair Darling lent his broad support to the proposals on Monday and said his officials were working on a “detailed scheme” based on the recommendations.

Mr King urged the chancellor to reflect on how such a scheme would interact with other measures introduced in the banking bail-out, not least the £250bn credit guarantee scheme. This allows banks to raise funding backed by the government with a maturity of up to three years.

The Treasury heeded the call and launched a “quick review” of the scheme to see if it had any implications for the proposals. The aim will be to “maximise its impact on financial and wider economic stability while ensuring that it does not crowd out market-based lending”.

Mr King told the Treasury select committee it “did not make sense to have two completely separate packages”.

Calling for an “integrated approach”, he said: “It would make sense to have the credit guarantee scheme that offers guarantees for unsecured borrowing.”

Offering guarantees to a narrow range of debt products would be a “big mistake” that would distort lending priorities. “The Crosby scheme is restricted to only one type of lending,” he said. “It would be a big mistake to generate lending for the mortgage market at the expense of crowding out lending to business.”

Sir James’s “strong recommendation” was for the government to auction guarantees to be attached by lenders to triple-A tranches of mortgage-backed securities issued to fund new lending.

The plan won backing from the European Securitisation Forum, which would “increase the availability of cash specifically targeted to new mortgage lending”.

One analyst said for the Crosby recommendations to be implemented, the industry would need new infrastructure to turn mortgages into bonds since the “master trust” platform type would be stymied by its reliance on remortgaging.

“Crosby’s recommendations … would also make the use of revolving master trusts more challenging,” said Ganesh Rajendra, head of securitisation research at Deutsche Bank.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2016. All rights reserved. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from and redistribute by email or post to the web.

More on this topic

Suggestions below based on Personal Finance

UK bank lending

Banks might be forgiven for finding it a little trying to have to listen to government ministers lecturing them about their lending practices. While playing to the public gallery with blood-curdling threats has its appeal, coercing the banks into lending randomly to all comers is hardly the best way for ministers to help the economy manage its way through the recession. While everyone wants to assist hard-pressed homeowners, for example, there is surely no sense in propping up an overpriced housing market with generous mortgage deals.

How to force banks to start lending

The Bank of England governor calls it the “single most pressing challenge to domestic economic policy”. But what are the options for getting banks to lend again?

A passive approach to bank stakes is inadequate

Governments of the world are becoming major shareholders in their financial institutions. The British government owns two mortgage lenders – Bradford & Bingley and Northern Rock – is likely soon to hold a majority of the capital of the Royal Bank of Scotland, and to be much the largest shareholder in the combined HBOS/Lloyds TSB. The US government has a dominant holding in AIG, one of the world’s largest insurers, and will soon hold a similar position in Citigroup, making it the biggest financial institution of all. Fortis and ABN Amro are owned by Benelux governments. And so on.