passengers boarding a private jet
Economies: proponents of corporate jets say they utlimately save companies time and money © Dreamstime

Two UK business jet airports are suing RAF Northolt after the military airport expanded into civilian flights to raise cash for the Ministry of Defence.

Biggin Hill and Oxford claim that, because Northolt is operated by the MoD and therefore taxpayer funded, it should not be competing against business airports in the London area, which also include Luton and Farnborough.

Deep cuts to the defence budget as the coalition government attempts to bring down the UK’s deficit have led to Northolt adopting a more commercial approach to secure its future.

In March last year the military airport said it would begin to expand, more than doubling civilian flight movements – take-offs and landings – from a self-imposed cap of 7,000 to 17,500 by 2016. Of that total, military movements will remain at about 5,500 a year.

The northwest London airport is attractive for private jet users because it is the closest airport to the capital’s West End. It is the base of 32 (The Royal) Squadron, which provides air transport for the royal family and the government and has previously been mooted as an option to increase flight capacity in the congested southeast.

“They’re marketing themselves as London’s premier business aviation airport, and in May we were treated to the sight of fully paid up members of the Royal Air Force exhibiting at a trade fair in Geneva,” said Will Curtis, managing director of Biggin Hill. “We, like Oxford, like Farnborough, have all been through a very tough time and they’ve pulled the rug from underneath us. It’s not a level playing field.”

Small airports have had a difficult time in the past few years after passenger numbers dropped sharply following the financial crisis.

Biggin Hill estimates it has lost business worth about £4m each year, a 5 per cent reduction in market share. It handled 11,411 commercial civilian flights in 2013. Oxford airport handled 8,025 flights in the same period.

The airports allege that Northolt, which has about 15 per cent of the London market in business aviation, makes cost savings by not having to adhere to the same safety standards as commercial airports.

As well as being granted a judicial review that will be heard next month, Biggin Hill and Oxford airports have also taken their case to the European competition authority.

The decision to expand Northolt has prompted anger from London mayor Boris Johnson, who fiercely opposes the expansion of Heathrow, west London’s main airport. Mr Johnson is to stand for election next May in the Uxbridge and South Ruislip constituency, in which Northolt is located.

“Northolt is in the heart of the suburbs, surrounded by tens of thousands of homes, and that means this decision goes against the mayor’s desire to reduce the number of Londoners exposed to potentially harmful levels of noise, congestion and poor air quality caused by aviation,” a spokesman for Mr Johnson said.

To save money, the defence department has outsourced contracts worth billions of pounds, has been selling prime properties such as its Deepcut barracks estate in Surrey, and has cut the army from about 100,000 to 80,000.

It denied that it was operating unfairly in expanding Northolt. “We do not deliberately undercut private enterprise and RAF Northolt adheres to Treasury rules,” the MoD said.

“We regularly review our charges against other commercial aerodromes to ensure they are representative of market rates. In addition, commercial flights have for many years operated from Military Aviation Authority regulated military aerodromes and have an excellent safety record.”

Additional reporting by Joel Lewin

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2024. All rights reserved.
Reuse this content (opens in new window) CommentsJump to comments section

Follow the topics in this article

Comments