LME halts plan to cut metals queues after court ruling

Listen to this article

00:00
00:00

The London Metal Exchange has been forced put on hold a new rule to tackle the long warehouse queues that US politicians and aluminium buyers blame for increasing the price of everything from drink cans to car bodies.

Queues of more than 500 days to take delivery of aluminium from LME warehouses became the focus of a furious debate last year, triggering a series of complaints by metal users, criticism by senators and investigations by US regulators.

MillerCoors, the brewer, claimed at a Senate hearing that the logjams at LME-registered warehouses owned by Goldman Sachs, Glencore Xstrata and other companies inflated global aluminium costs by billions of dollars – allegations that were fiercely disputed.

Warehouse owners profit from long queues because they earn rent. Owners of the metal also gain, by taking advantage of the aluminium market “contango”, where prices for future delivery exceed current prices, enabling them to sell the metal forward for a small but safe profit.

In an attempt to tackle the logjam, the LME in November announced a new rule that would oblige warehouses with queues longer than 50 days to load more metal out than they bring in.

But the plans, due to take effect at the start of April, were thrown into disarray on Thursday when a UK court said the consultation procedure was “unfair and unlawful”, and set the rule aside.

The case against the LME was brought by Rusal, the world’s largest aluminium producer. The Russian company claimed that its human rights had been breached, and that the LME did not consider all the options to tackle queues.

It said that the new rule would remove support for aluminium prices, which are under pressure due to huge global stockpiles of the metal. At $1,739 a tonne for three-month delivery on the LME, the price is barely half of its pre-financial crisis peak.

Oleg Deripaska, chief executive of Rusal, said: “We welcome this decision by the High Court and look forward to working closely with the LME, and indeed all key stakeholders.”

The court’s decision caught the market by surprise. Analysts say that reform of the LME’s warehouse rules is urgent because the exchange price, used by producers and consumers to hedge and as a benchmark for contracts, had drifted so far from the price for physical delivery of aluminium because of the queues.

The LME said: “We continue to believe that Rusal’s complaint was without merit in its entirety and are currently taking legal advice with regard to our options, including appeal or re-consultation.”

Other reforms to the warehouse system, including enhanced power to tackle artificial queue formation and publication of more data, would proceed as planned, it said.

Novelis, which is the world’s biggest buyer of aluminium and supplies material for Coca-Cola cans, said it was disappointed by the postponement of the warehouse rules.

“The supply chain risk and inflated premiums that the current system allows will continue to impact the overall market and cause real business challenges for aluminium consumers,” said Nick Madden, chief supply chain officer at Novelis.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2017. All rights reserved. You may share using our article tools. Please don't copy articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.