web_Parliament stopping Brexit

This article is from today’s FT Opinion email. Sign up to receive a daily digest of the big issues straight to your inbox.

A second referendum on Brexit is the hot potato of British politics. The most hardcore supporters of remaining in the EU point out that public support is gradually increasing for a plebiscite on whatever deal Theresa May brings back from Brussels later this year. On the opposite side of the political arena, ardent Leavers think it would be anti-democratic to try and overturn the biggest vote for anything in British history. And a lot of people in the middle just want the question to go away.

Philip Stephens makes the Tory case for another vote in his latest column, citing the thoughts of philosopher Edmund Burke. He once said that “your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion.” Many Conservative MPs feel that Brexit will be damaging for the national interest, so can they bring themselves to vote for a deal that will damage Britain? Will they feel the pull of their Burkean obligations? Or will they go along with Brexit, with a heavy sigh, as they have done until now?

Martin Wolf, on a similar theme, dissects the irredeemable folly of a 'no deal' exit from the EU and the damage it could do to the UK economy.

Marcos de Barros Lisboa, an economist, argues that Brazil desperately needs politicians with the courage to see through structural reforms.

Suzan DelBene, a Democratic member of the House of Representatives, writes that the US must follow in Europe's footsteps with better data protection laws.

What you've been saying

Who are the ‘we’ who voted for Trump? — Letter from Paul Hallwood:
Phillip Hawley (Letters, June 26) says: “Like it or lump it, Trump’s actions are just what we voted for.” Does this mean Mr Hawley was on the electoral college when all of 306 people voted for Donald Trump, thus totally negating the “will of the people” who by a majority of more than 3m voted for Hillary Clinton? I had to laugh when on a recent BBC programme an American political expert referred to the British constitution as “anachronistic”. Come again?

Comment by EnglishRose on Minimum wage laws still fall short for those on the bottom:
The minimum wage for my sons in the UK now is just over £5 (one is working in a London hotel at present on a bit more than that; they are students). We somehow need to remove the state subsidy of housing benefits and tax credits which has kept wages down, try to ensure we don't still have the 240,000 workers coming to the UK that leave each year, and get back to a more natural supply and demand for labour.

A poorer background will teach the value of money — Letter from David Coombs:
Further to Attracta Mooney’s report “Self-analysis will make you a better investor” (FTfm, June 25): the paper co-written by Oleg Chuprinin which finds that fund managers from poorer backgrounds outperform those from richer ones is thought-provoking. While higher barriers of entry into the industry faced by those from poorer backgrounds must have an influence on their superior performance, something also worth considering is the way they have been brought up. Those from poorer backgrounds are more likely to have been raised to demand greater value for money from their purchases than those where financial constraints are less. A child with 50p to spend at the local sweet shop is going to be a more discerning buyer than one with a £10 note. Maybe having to learn the value of money from a young age has led them to be more over-particular when investing their clients’ money.

Today's opinion

The irremediable folly of a ‘no deal’ Brexit
Claims that leaving the EU will boost growth rest on questionable assumptions

The world must stand up for the rule of law in Libya
Armed faction’s seizure of oil terminals threatens to send country into chaos

Wanted: politicians with the courage to reform Brazil
A truckers’ strike showed how complex the challenges are that the country faces

Looking for love (or is it Brexit?) on all the wrong islands
Imagine if certain British politicians were sent to a luxury paradise to seek romance

Constitutional law in UK and US is exciting, and that is bad
Brexit and Trump raise troubling questions about the exercise of executive power

From lab-grown burgers to Uber-style banks
The Bank of England and Financial Times school blog competition

Instant Insight: Poland tries to stay on the right side of Donald Trump
Diluting a Holocaust speech law is a sop to the country’s American protector

If the US fails to protect citizens’ data, it will lag behind
Unless America steps up with its own rules, GDPR will become the global norm

Free Lunch: Understanding how a single currency works
Better knowledge must lead to better policy

FT Alphaville: Urban redevelopment, Potemkin façade edition

The compelling Tory case for a second Brexit vote
Some say another referendum would be divisive, but Britain is already deeply split

FT View

FT View: Germany’s defeat leaves Merkel down but not out
The connection between sport and politics is elusive — but real

FT View: The BoE cannot solve the productivity puzzle
Central banks target cyclical growth, not long-run output per head

The Big Read

The Big Read: Eurozone reform: solving the Franco-German puzzle
Macron has won Merkel’s support for his budget plan but their detractors could scupper the project at the EU summit

Get alerts on Opinion when a new story is published

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2022. All rights reserved.
Reuse this content (opens in new window) CommentsJump to comments section

Follow the topics in this article