Experimental feature

Listen to this article

Experimental feature

It is Washington’s new hobby: keeping track of acronyms denoting US government programmes and totting up the associated cashflows. Treasury secretary Tim Geithner posed an arithmetical challenge at the weekend, announcing that $135bn remained of the $700bn from the troubled asset relief programme. The Government Accountability Office believed there was $110bn left.

The original bank capital injection programme accounts for $218bn. It is surprising, perhaps, that beleaguered banks did not sign up for the full $250bn allocated them before the November deadline. Emergency top-ups for Citigroup and Bank of America came to $53bn. The ultimate basketcase, AIG, got $70bn. Schemes to stimulate consumer and business lending total $95bn. Part of that, $25bn, is earmarked for Mr Geithner’s latest initiative to buy banks’ bad assets. This plan also receives a further $75bn. Then there is $50bn in funds for mortgage relief. Finally, there is $30bn for the auto sector.

Phew. That $590bn is higher than the Treasury’s estimate because it believes $25bn will be repaid by banks this year. That looks reasonable. Four banks on Tuesday repurchased $338m of preferred Tarp stock – the first to do so. Bigger fish, such as Goldman Sachs with $10bn, are keen to hand back their Treasury readies.

Still, the assumptions involved, some in programmes yet to launch, make Tarp maths an art as much as a science. So-called Tarp cop Neil Barofsky puts total commitments at $3,000bn including outlays from other branches of government. That reflects Treasury efforts to eke out Tarp funds and put off returning cap-in-hand to Congress, even though an ever weakening economy will probably mean some banks will need more taxpayer funds. Good money management is laudable. Delaying the inevitable, however, merely means greater problems in store.

To e-mail the Lex team confidentially click here
To post public comments click here

The Lex column is now on Twitter. To receive our daily line-up and links to Lex notes via Twitter, click here


Lex is the FT’s agenda-setting column, giving an authoritative view on corporate and financial matters. It is also one of the few parts of FT.com available only to Premium subscribers. This article is provided for free as an example. A Premium subscription gives you unlimited access to all FT content, including all Lex articles and the FT mobile Newsreader.

Subscribe now

If you have questions or comments, please e-mail help@ft.com or call:

US and Canada: +1 800 628 8088
Asia: +852 2905 5555
UK, Europe and rest of the world: +44 (0)20 7775 6248

Get alerts on Banks when a new story is published

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2019. All rights reserved.
Reuse this content (opens in new window)

Comments have not been enabled for this article.

Follow the topics in this article