In this Thursday, Jan. 26, 2017, photo, a Norfolk Southern freight train hauling coal makes it way through downtown Pittsburgh. President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris climate accord may have only limited immediate impact on many U.S. companies, according to analysts. The American Coal Council said the climate accord “would put America at a competitive disadvantage and our nation’s abundant energy resources under lock and key.” The group said more than 90 percent of U.S. coal plants are equipped with advanced emissions controls, and that advances in technology will lead to further improvement. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)
© AP

On the campaign trail in 2016, President Donald Trump often pledged to bring back coal. For mineworkers, that promise remains unfulfilled. The number of jobs in coal mining in the US is up only 800 since Mr Trump’s inauguration in January 2017, and has been on a declining trend since last October.

For some investors in the coal industry, however, the past 15 months have been rewarding as some US coal companies have prospered — but Mr Trump’s policies had little to do with it.

Peabody Energy, the world’s largest private sector coal producer, entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2016. It returned to the stock market in April last year, having shed $5.2bn of debt, and its shares have subsequently risen by 17 per cent.

Alpha Natural Resources, another leading US coal producer, filed for bankruptcy in 2015, and was subsequently broken up, with some of its assets being bought by a new company called Contura Energy, owned by Alpha’s lenders. On Monday Contura and the remnants of Alpha announced that they were merging to reunite the business, albeit in a greatly slimmed-down form. The merged company, which will retain the Contura name, is aiming to list on the New York Stock Exchange by the end of September.

A graphic with no description

Mr Trump’s attack on the climate policies of his predecessor Barack Obama, including plans to withdraw from the Paris agreement and to scrap new regulations on carbon dioxide emissions from power generation, have apparently had little effect. The amount of electricity generated from coal in the US dropped by 2 per cent last year, and is expected to drop by a further 3 per cent this year.

Nor do the Trump administration’s attempts to ease the regulatory burden on coal mining yet appear to have had a noticeable effect. Peabody’s US operating costs per ton were up 4 per cent in the first quarter of this year compared with the equivalent period of 2017.

The big difference has come from a surge in demand in international markets, for both thermal coal used in power plants and metallurgical, or “met” coal, which is used in blast furnaces to make steel. US exports of thermal coal more than doubled last year, thanks to strong demand from countries including India, South Korea and Japan.

A graphic with no description

But it is met coal that is causing the greatest excitement, throwing a lifeline to Appalachia, the region running from Pennsylvania to Alabama that is the traditional heartland of the US industry.

“The plight of the Appalachian producers has been grim,” said Kevin Book of ClearView Energy Partners, a research firm. “And export demand for met coal has been one of the few bright spots.”

The reasons have been factors beyond the Trump administration’s control. Cyclone Debbie, which hit eastern Australia in March last year, caused widespread disruption to much of the country’s met coal production, and its industry has been struggling to make up the shortfall.

Meanwhile, China has been intermittently curbing its coal production, while its demand has grown. A crackdown on steel production from old-fashioned induction furnaces had boosted activity at blast furnaces and hence demand for met coal, said David Lipschitz, an analyst at Macquarie.

The result has been soaring prices for met coal worldwide, including in the US. The S&P Global Platts US met coal price rose from about $80 a ton at the start of 2016 to a peak of $295 a ton last year, and even though it has since fallen back, it is still about $180 a ton today. Met coal production has been lucrative for US producers and for Peabody, which mines it in Australia.

Peabody’s first-quarter earnings, published last week, showed a clear divide: at the Australian operations, which principally produce met coal, earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation were up 23 per cent, while at the US operations, which produce thermal coal, they were down 28 per cent.

A graphic with no description

Overall, the net effect was that Peabody generated record free cash flow in the quarter of $573m. It has been able to expand its planned share buyback programme from $500m to $1bn.

“A lot of our focus in 2017 was on cash retention and paying down debt,” said Glenn Kellow, chief executive. “We expect this year to be focused on returning cash to shareholders.”

The prospect of similarly being able to cash in on met coal is the big attraction in the Contura-Alpha deal. The merged company will be the largest US met coal supplier, and Contura expects the world seaborne market to keep growing, from 321m tons last year to 345m tons in 2019, as worldwide steel production continues to increase.

Ironically, Mr Book points out, one threat to that attractive prospect might be a cut in steel production in China and other countries because of the tariffs on imports imposed by Mr Trump.

Get alerts on Coal when a new story is published

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2019. All rights reserved.
Reuse this content (opens in new window)

Follow the topics in this article