<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>








    
    
    
    













        
            
            
        <!-- FT CACHE --> 

<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="http://www.ft.com/FTCOM/XSL/styleRSSFeed.xsl"?><rss xmlns:java="java" xmlns:ft="http://www.ft.com/FTRSSExtensions" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><atom:link type="application/xml" rel="self" href="http://www.ft.com/rss/comment/letters"/><title>FT.com / Comment &amp; analysis, Letters</title><link>http://www.ft.com/comment/letters</link><ft:rsslink>http://www.ft.com/rss/comment/letters</ft:rsslink><description>FT.com / Comment &amp; analysis, Letters</description><language>en</language><copyright>© Copyright The Financial Times Ltd 2009. "FT" and "Financial Times" are trademarks of the Financial Times. See http://www.ft.com/servicestools/help/terms#legal1 for the terms and conditions of reuse.</copyright><webMaster>client.support@ft.com (Client Support)</webMaster><pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Newspapers</category><ttl>60</ttl><rating>(PICS-1.1 "http://www.classify.org/safesurf/" L gen true for "http://www.ft.com/" r (SS~~000 1))</rating><item><title>Ostrom deserves her Nobel coverage</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/7b5fbae6-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7b5fbae6-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From Dr Charles Palmer. Sir, A hunter and self-professed student of the work of Oliver Williamson, Mrs Moneypenny seems to have shot herself in the foot with her admission of ignorance of Elinor Ostrom's work</description><pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Both sides did terrible things</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/ffa80830-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ffa80830-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From Mr Gavin Turner. Sir, I was surprised, as many both Catholic and Anglican will have been, that the FT chose to publish the quite astonishingly intemperate letter from Thomas Granchi</description><pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Operation modelled on camps used by Spanish in Cuba</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/db15aa18-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/db15aa18-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From Mr J.E. Golding. Sir, John Lloyd, talking about the Boer War, repeats the old canard that 'Britain ... invented the concentration camps in which thousands of women and children died</description><pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Missing piece in total expense ratio</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/9b3bdcc8-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9b3bdcc8-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From Mr Richard Saunders. Sir, Matthew Vincent raises the spectre of 'hidden charges' in funds ('Total expenses robbery – or TER', Serious Money, October 31)</description><pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Damien Hirst belongs to art market history</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/863a5ffc-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/863a5ffc-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From Mr James Goodwin. Sir, Your article 'Artist provides model for business' (October 31) read more like an advertorial than balanced reporting</description><pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Lay Lefebvrites and communion</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/7d7551f6-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7d7551f6-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From Mr Francis Bown. Sir, William Sibree (Letters, October 31) asserts that Lefebvrites 'may not receive communion from a Catholic priest and Catholics may not receive communion from them'</description><pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Completing a process already very far advanced</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/d900ca32-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d900ca32-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From Mr Albion M. Urdank. Sir, I thought Thomas Granchi's letter (October 31) unfair to Henry VIII and suggested problems for High Church Anglicans contemplating conversion to Roman Catholicism</description><pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Admirable model provided by the Anglican tradition</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/b2c863d4-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b2c863d4-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From The Rev Thomas Miller. Sir, It is more than tiresome that Thomas Granchi perpetuates the false notion that the English Reformation can be reduced to the personal politics of Henry VIII</description><pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Why not run your subjects down?</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/a5b49244-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a5b49244-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From Mr Brian Harrison. Sir, A weekend is hardly a weekend without the FT. Your well-crafted articles give me many hours of reading pleasure</description><pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>I've coated my bulbs with cayenne</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/69f18a78-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/69f18a78-cb3c-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From Mr Philip Wingfield. Sir, I hope it is not foolhardy to disagree with both Robin Lane Fox and Lady Berrill, but I am using a different strategy to protect my bulbs</description><pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Tax burden that would put a realistic price on the head of carbon capture</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/505cedc2-ca75-11de-a3a3-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/505cedc2-ca75-11de-a3a3-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From Mr Joseph Spear. Sir, I was riveted to your colour supplement on the future of energy (November 4) and in particular to "The big store" by Ed Crooks</description><pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Things are getting better every day</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/0678ac5a-ca75-11de-a3a3-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0678ac5a-ca75-11de-a3a3-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From Prof Adrian Woods. Sir, Forget looking for the first signs of the green shoots of recovery: the recession is now over as Martin Lukes (November 5) is already working his own special economic magic</description><pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Utilising fully US medical resources</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/c2021d68-ca74-11de-a3a3-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c2021d68-ca74-11de-a3a3-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From Prof Krishnamachar Sreenivasan. Sir, Absent from Clive Crook's analyses of US healthcare reform is the use of technology, a backbone of cost-cutting for many US health maintenance organisations </description><pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Too big to fail arguments hark back to Gosplan</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/9660a63e-ca74-11de-a3a3-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9660a63e-ca74-11de-a3a3-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From Mr Michael Rossman. Sir, The ongoing "too-big-to-fail" debate goes to the heart of competitive market economies where Adam Smith's invisible hand is the arbiter of success and failure</description><pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Problem is the Pakistan military's idée fixe with Kashmir</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/0/9195a636-ca74-11de-a3a3-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fletters</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9195a636-ca74-11de-a3a3-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>From Prof Sumit Ganguly. Sir, David Gardner proffers a familiar red herring ("Pakistan needs a new world view", November 3): the need to prod India to address the Kashmir question</description><pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>






    


