<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>








    
    
    
    













        
            
            
        <!-- FT CACHE --> 

<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="http://www.ft.com/FTCOM/XSL/styleRSSFeed.xsl"?><rss xmlns:java="java" xmlns:ft="http://www.ft.com/FTRSSExtensions" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><atom:link type="application/xml" rel="self" href="http://www.ft.com/rss/comment/columnists/timharford"/><title>FT.com - Tim Harford</title><link>http://www.ft.com/arts/columnists/timharford</link><ft:rsslink>http://www.ft.com/rss/comment/columnists/timharford</ft:rsslink><description>FT.com - Tim Harford</description><language>en</language><copyright>© Copyright The Financial Times Ltd 2009. "FT" and "Financial Times" are trademarks of the Financial Times. See http://www.ft.com/servicestools/help/terms#legal1 for the terms and conditions of reuse.</copyright><webMaster>client.support@ft.com (Client Support)</webMaster><pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 23:31:38 +0000</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Sun, 8 Nov 2009 17:43:08 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Newspapers</category><ttl>15</ttl><rating>(PICS-1.1 "http://www.classify.org/safesurf/" L gen true for "http://www.ft.com/" r (SS~~000 1))</rating><item><title>Dear Economist: Why a 'pointless' tax cut really counted</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/38aae2e4-c8e3-11de-8f9d-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/38aae2e4-c8e3-11de-8f9d-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>As VAT returns to 17.5%, some retailers say that the increase will have a negative impact. This doesn't sound logical, but is it true?</description><pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 23:31:38 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>How a celebrity chef turned into a social scientist</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/30fa0972-c81a-11de-8ba8-00144feab49a.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/30fa0972-c81a-11de-8ba8-00144feab49a.html</guid><description>Jamie Oliver's 'school dinners' campaign has been successful, but Tim Harford wonders why it had to take a TV company to carry out a proper policy experiment</description><pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 23:23:43 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Why feedback can be just so much noise</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/ca3c1e38-c20a-11de-be3a-00144feab49a.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/ca3c1e38-c20a-11de-be3a-00144feab49a.html</guid><description>A comment-free environment is not conducive to learning new skills, but then again, honest appraisal can be confusing or demoralising, writes Tim Harford
</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:44:03 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Dear Economist: Why don't all waiters get their just desserts?</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/22f340c0-c20a-11de-be3a-00144feab49a.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/22f340c0-c20a-11de-be3a-00144feab49a.html</guid><description>Do waiters in mid-priced restaurants work less than those at high-end ones? If not, shouldn't their tips be the same?</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:44:03 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Want to help? Then make life harder for the aid agencies</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/3149ef56-bd1a-11de-a7ec-00144feab49a.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3149ef56-bd1a-11de-a7ec-00144feab49a.html</guid><description>Only a wild optimist would expect agencies to adopt a market-style focus on value for money, so economists suggest a different approach, writes Tim Harford
</description><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:49:59 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Dear Economist: Loving and losing – is the cost too high?</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/4a962ace-beaa-11de-b4ab-00144feab49a.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/4a962ace-beaa-11de-b4ab-00144feab49a.html</guid><description>Is it possible for the cost (the grief from the imminent passing of my pet rat) to outweigh the benefit (the joy gained through time spent with him)?</description><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:49:59 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Dear Economist: Fine wine or finer feelings?</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/77030692-b92b-11de-98ee-00144feab49a.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/77030692-b92b-11de-98ee-00144feab49a.html</guid><description>I drink too much wine and am unable to convince myself that doing so is unhealthy. How can I keep my habit under control?</description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:42:29 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>A brilliant (and doomed) template for healthcare reform</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/d9370b98-b79a-11de-9812-00144feab49a.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d9370b98-b79a-11de-9812-00144feab49a.html</guid><description>Not only is it colossally wasteful to outsource medical decisions to bureaucrats, it is also infantilising for us as independent human beings, writes Tim Harford
</description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:42:29 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Superfreakonomics</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/1c1d0386-b9e4-11de-a747-00144feab49a.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/1c1d0386-b9e4-11de-a747-00144feab49a.html</guid><description>This sequel to the pop-economics bestseller reveals more gripping scientific research and answers why a pimp has greater impact than a realtor, writes Tim Harford
</description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:37:36 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Dear Economist: Can we stop football teams 'buying' wins?</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/7423c56a-b3a9-11de-ae8d-00144feab49a.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/7423c56a-b3a9-11de-ae8d-00144feab49a.html</guid><description>Should the football authorities put a cap on the total value of players, based on their transfer cost, that can play for a Premier League team in any given match?</description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:59:36 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>How an inconvenient economist upset the cool crowd</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/3138a3fc-b3a8-11de-ae8d-00144feab49a.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3138a3fc-b3a8-11de-ae8d-00144feab49a.html</guid><description>John List's attention to the nuts and bolts of experimental method has demolished some of the most cherished results in behavioural economics, writes Tim Harford
</description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:59:36 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Dear Economist: Should I reveal my colourful past?</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/a9fc41c2-ad5e-11de-9caf-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/a9fc41c2-ad5e-11de-9caf-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>I recently met an artist whom I find extremely hot! How much information should I divulge to him and what would be the benefit of opening up before we hit a home run?</description><pubDate>Fri, 2 Oct 2009 22:54:47 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Dan Brown and the mystery of the lost profit margin</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/a44c87fe-ad5f-11de-9caf-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/a44c87fe-ad5f-11de-9caf-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>The unprecedented price war over the novelist's latest book, 'The Lost Symbol', makes real an old joke: losing money on every sale, but making it up on volume</description><pubDate>Fri, 2 Oct 2009 22:54:47 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Trust me – we have a serious carbon credibility problem</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/6dd2b20c-a71a-11de-bd14-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/6dd2b20c-a71a-11de-bd14-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>When it comes to climate change, few people are talking about time inconsistency. Why should we believe that words today will mean action tomorrow, asks Tim Harford
</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:37:36 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Dear Economist: My housemates won't clean the kitchen</title><link>http://traxfer.ft.com/cms/s/2/fd3ff4fa-a719-11de-bd14-00144feabdc0.html?o=%2Frss%2Fcomment%2Fcolumnists%2Ftimharford</link><guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/fd3ff4fa-a719-11de-bd14-00144feabdc0.html</guid><description>I thought that a grim punishment strategy would maintain a system of alternate cleaners, but my housemates do not see it as credible. What should I do?</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:37:36 +0100</pubDate></item></channel></rss>






    


