Financial Times FT.com

Ditch theory and take away the punchbowl

By John Plender

Published: August 4 2009 16:18 | Last updated: August 4 2009 16:18

There are, by now, a thousand and one ideas in circulation on how to change the regulatory architecture of finance. But what about changing the central bankers – or at the very least their mindset, since their notions about how to deal with bubbles have proved extraordinarily costly for the rest of us.

Quantitative easing

Interactive audio graphic explains how quantitative easing works and how this policy could stimulate the economy

Fifty years ago, central bankerly wisdom was encapsulated in the splendid phrase of William McChesney Martin, longest-serving chairman of the Federal Reserve, to the effect that the job of the Fed was to take away the punchbowl just as the party gets going. That is the polar opposite of the view of Alan Greenspan, who presided over the Fed during the bubble period. He believed that bubbles were difficult to identify and that the central bankers’ task was to clear up the mess after the bursting of the bubble rather than to make a pre-emptive strike to rectify it.

You have viewed your allowance of free articles. If you wish to view more, click the button below.

Read this