Financial Times FT.com

Signs of distress?

By Andrew Hill

Published: November 7 2009 02:00 | Last updated: November 7 2009 02:00

A nalysts' explanations for the Bank of England decision to plough a further £25bn into quantitative easing make it sound about as scientific as necromancy or alchemy. As the FT wrote, one possibility is that the Bank wants to "send a signal" the policy is working and may soon no longer be needed. What was it poet Stevie Smith wrote about misunderstood signals? "I was much further out than you thought and not waving but drowning."

andrew.hill@ft.com To comment, visit www.ft.com/lombard

You have viewed your allowance of free articles. If you wish to view more, click the button below.

Read this