Financial Times FT.com

A bad nuclear deal

Published: August 26 2008 03:00 | Last updated: August 26 2008 03:00

The Bush administration has long been guilty of a fundamental inconsistency on the issue of nuclear proliferation. On the one hand, it insists that international sanctions must be targeted on Iran until it suspends its uranium enrichment programme. The US says sanctions are necessary because it argues that Iran wants to build a nuclear weapon - while Tehran says it merely wants to develop a civil nuclear energy programme.

On the other hand, President Bush makes the opposite argument when it comes to India. In 1974, India stunned the world by detonating a nuclear weapon using Canadian technology that had been imported ostensibly to develop peaceful atomic energy. But the Bush administration says India's illicit pursuit of nuclear weapons can be forgiven. Three years ago, the White House declared it was prepared to allow India to buy nuclear fuel and equipment for its civil nuclear programme. India was required to offer nothing in return - such as a promise not to expand its nuclear arsenal or to stop atomic testing.

You have viewed your allowance of free articles. If you wish to view more, click the button below.

Read this