Financial Times FT.com

SEC explanation on Merrill deal ‘puzzling’

By Joanna Chung and Francesco Guerrera in New York

Published: August 26 2009 00:43 | Last updated: August 26 2009 00:43

A federal judge on Tuesday raised fresh questions about the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s settlement with Bank of America over bonus disclosures, calling the regulator’s explanation for why it did not charge individuals “puzzling”.

The SEC, in a court filing on Monday, said BofA’s alleged failure to disclose bonuses paid to Merrill Lynch employees before the companies merged was largely the work of attorneys who advised the banks. The regulator said it was constrained by the fact that the bank had not waived attorney-client privilege.

You have viewed your allowance of free articles. If you wish to view more, click the button below.

Read this