Financial Times FT.com

Painting by numbers

Published: October 9 2009 16:42 | Last updated: October 9 2009 22:28

With an artistic, if hardly coincidental, symmetry, the great art market boom of 2006-08 reached its apogee at the very moment Lehman Brothers went bust. On September 15-16 2008, investors splashed out £111m at a Sotheby’s auction of newly pickled works by Damien Hirst. Thirteen months on, next week’s Frieze contemporary art fair in London – Europe’s biggest – and its associated exhibitions and auctions will be an important barometer of confidence, and whether the precipitous plunge in prices is bottoming out. Omens are not good. A Bloomberg survey found low-end estimates for proceeds of contemporary art sales by Sotheby’s, Christie’s and Phillips during Frieze week were down 81 per cent compared with last year.

A deep correction was inevitable. According to Art Market Research, in the two years to September 2008 the average gain for five main art market sectors was a jaw-dropping 210 per cent. Contemporary art prices increased 313 per cent, though, surprisingly, Impressionist prices gained most – 390 per cent.
If the last art bubble of 1988-92 was pumped up by Japanese buying, this one was inflated by bonus-laden investment bankers, hedge fund managers and the odd Russian oligarch. As in financial markets, the idea took hold that prices could only rise.

You have viewed your allowance of free articles. If you wish to view more, click the button below.

Read this