Financial Times FT.com

Wood on writing . . . and writers

By Trevor Butterworth

Published: February 2 2008 02:00 | Last updated: February 2 2008 02:00

Few critics can make literature sound so vital but just as James Wood's forensic reading can dazzle with its brilliance, writes Trevor Butterworth , it can leave some novels looking like the scene of an authorial crime. The following are extracts from How Fiction Works :

"Novelists should thank Flaubert the way poets thank spring: it all begins again with him. There is really a time before Flaubert and a time after him. Flaubert decisively established what most readers and writers think of as modern realist narration, and his influence is almost too familiar to be visible. We hardly remark of good prose that it favours the telling and brilliant detail; that it privileges a high degree of visual noticing; that it maintains an unsentimental composure and knows how to withdraw, like a good valet, from superfluous commentary; that it judges good and bad neutrally; that it seeks out the truth, even at the cost of repelling us; and that the author's fingerprints on all this are . . . traceable but not visible. You can find some of this in Defoe, or Austen or Balzac, but not all of it until Flaubert.

You have viewed your allowance of free articles. If you wish to view more, click the button below.

Read this