Financial Times FT.com

Oracle/Microsoft

Published: October 5 2006 14:30 | Last updated: October 5 2006 22:54

Who says investors hate aggressive acquirers? Since mid-2003, when Larry Ellison started betting Oracle’s cash on a series of aggressive deals, the software company’s shares have not really been punished. They have outperformed Microsoft, which used its cash more conservatively. This year, as investors have got more comfortable, Oracle’s shares have actually jumped 48 per cent compared with Microsoft’s 7 per cent.

ChartOf course, it is not all about how each has used its firepower. Oracle’s recent share price run is partly down to the performance of its core database business. The growth potential of Windows and Office remains key for Microsoft investors.

But how they have used their balance sheets has been a factor. Since mid-2003, both have used cash equivalent to roughly one quarter of current market capitalisation on a mixture of shareholder payouts and acquisitions. In Oracle’s case, more than 70 per cent has gone on acquisitions. That has helped narrow rival SAP’s lead in enterprise applications – something Oracle could not have done by itself. It has left Oracle with only a small net cash position.

In Microsoft’s case, virtually all the cash went to shareholders. Although Microsoft has struggled to build its internet business, particularly in search, it is trying to narrow Google’s lead through investment rather than acquisition. It retains an inefficient balance sheet, with net cash and investments above $40bn.

In a world where tech companies are maturing and cash flows are more stable – hence the rash of interest from private equity – Oracle’s balance sheet looks more sensible.

Microsoft should reduce its cash pile further. Acquisitions would be risky. For example, Microsoft would face anti-trust risks if it tried buying Yahoo to bolster its internet position – as Oracle did buying PeopleSoft. Yahoo would also be more expensive than PeopleSoft and a riskier bet on growth rather than cost-cutting. But it would fill a gap. Having seen how investors have treated Mr “Splash the Cash” Ellison, Microsoft might one day feel emboldened to get more aggressive itself.

More Lex in this sector

US yield curve

Interchange fees

EU commission appointments

Banks’ Dubai exposure

UK booksellers

New Jersey Nets

China’s 50-year bond

Left column content

Lex by email

Sign up

Signup

FT.com subscribers can now receive three email packages: Lex live, Lex alerts and Best of Lex

Jobs and classifieds

Jobs

Search
Type your search criteria below:

Global Head of Aftersales

Material Handling Capital Equipment

Deputy Finance Director

Department for Work and Pensions

Experienced Bankers & Credit Professionals

The Asset Protection Agency (APA)

Area Sales Manager (Africa)

Material Handling, Capital Equipment

Recruiters

FT.com can deliver talented individuals across all industries around the world

Post a job now