© The Financial Times Ltd 2016
FT and 'Financial Times' are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
The Financial Times and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice.
Last updated: May 27, 2009 9:38 am
Privacy is a wonderful thing. With a straight face one can say that a company is worth several billion dollars having not produced a single fact to back it up. Similarly the debate about Facebook’s valuation is somewhat futile. There are simply not enough numbers to construct a meaningful picture of the social network’s finances.
For instance, on Tuesday, Russian investment company Digital Sky Technologies announced that it has paid $200m for a 2 per cent stake in Facebook via preference shares. With a similar (but undisclosed) structure to Microsoft’s $240m investment in late 2007, the putative valuation has shrunk from $15bn to $10bn. DST also expects to purchase another $100m of common stock owned by Facebook’s employees in the summer.
Facebook itself, meanwhile, refuses to divulge its financial performance. Revenues apparently grew by 70 per cent last year, and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg expects to produce positive cashflow in 2010. Positive earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation are claimed for the last five quarters. Independent guesses for sales run at about $500m in 2009.
However, the real question is why Facebook, apparently doing so well, needs the extra funds? DST owns stakes in a variety of Russian and eastern European online companies, including social networks. It might perhaps have some insight from experiments to extract cash from users, but the fact remains that Facebook is still working out how to turn its popularity into real money. Advertisers treat social networks as a low quality prospect, thanks to the vast amount of inventory available, and users’ general lack of interest in clicking on adverts while they are commenting on pictures of their friends. Still, any billboard that reaches 300m sets of eyeballs every month is valuable. At least we now know how much DST thinks Facebook is worth.
The Lex column is now on Twitter. To receive our daily line-up and links to Lex notes via Twitter, click here
Lex is the FT’s agenda-setting column, giving an authoritative view on corporate and financial matters. It is also one of the few parts of FT.com available only to Premium subscribers. This article is provided for free as an example. A Premium subscription gives you unlimited access to all FT content, including all Lex articles and the FT mobile Newsreader.
If you have questions or comments, please e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org or call:
US and Canada: +1 800 628 8088
Asia: +852 2905 5555
UK, Europe and rest of the world: +44 (0)20 7775 6248
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2016. You may share using our article tools.
Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.