© The Financial Times Ltd 2016
FT and 'Financial Times' are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
The Financial Times and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice.
Last updated: June 17, 2009 6:28 pm
The 90-page white paper on US regulatory reform has something for everyone – to argue over, that is. Bickering was inevitable. But the proposals are a comprehensive, nuanced attempt to elucidate a new structure for regulation.
Radicals are disappointed that only the Office of Thrift Supervision, an agency so disparaged iits demise was a foregone conclusion, gets the chop. In tripping delicately through the existing regulatory maze, however, the Treasury has hopefully kept some political powder dry to fight questions of greater substance.
One is the emerging power of the Federal Reserve. It can designate companies of systemic importance and bring them under its top-level supervision. Former limits to the Fed’s power, in areas such as payments and settlements, or checking up on broker-dealers, are removed.
This constitutes a quiet consolidation of regulatory authority behind the mish-mash of acronyms and agencies, intended perhaps to avoid overly politicising the Fed’s remit. There will usually be another body to take the flak.
Elsewhere, the white paper wades into classic US schisms – including the separation of banking from commerce (possibly signalling the end of retailers’ store cards, say) and the authority of states versus the federal government.
Establishing a national monitor for the insurance sector, with measures to impose greater consistency across state regulators merely threatened, suggests a lack of appetite for that battle.
A new consumer protection agency meanwhile could rile both those who resent local powers slipping away to Washington and large companies who fear states’ ability to impose their own stricter variants of centrally determined rules.
Other sections remain light-weight. The old standoff between securities and futures regulation is barely addressed. And no one knows what more, high-quality capital for banks actually means. The detailed wrangling has yet to start.
The Lex column is now on Twitter. To receive our daily line-up and links to Lex notes via Twitter, click here
Lex is the FT’s agenda-setting column, giving an authoritative view on corporate and financial matters. It is also one of the few parts of FT.com available only to Premium subscribers. This article is provided for free as an example. A Premium subscription gives you unlimited access to all FT content, including all Lex articles and the FT mobile Newsreader.
If you have questions or comments, please e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org or call:
US and Canada: +1 800 628 8088
Asia: +852 2905 5555
UK, Europe and rest of the world: +44 (0)20 7775 6248
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2016. You may share using our article tools.
Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.