© The Financial Times Ltd 2016 FT and 'Financial Times' are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
September 6, 2013 7:30 pm
I’m becoming increasingly concerned about launch prices for unknown wines. You can, for example, buy a bottle of Stéphane Serre’s L’Indivisible Languedoc red for €235 (about £200). His wines do not carry a specific appellation, supposedly the top rank of French wine, because he wants to distinguish them from those of his neighbours in the tiny Corbières village of Montlaur. So he sells his range of colour-coded bottlings as mere Vin de France. Referring to Appellation d’Origine Contrôlée regulations, he says: “Our research is too important to be curbed by bureaucracy.” You probably won’t have heard of his Domaine de l’Amandyère because he hasn’t actually managed to sell very much yet. As he puts it, “I need to develop my commercial network.”
Intense, shaven-headed and in his early forties, this “artisan wine jeweller”, as Serre calls himself, only recently returned to his family’s vine-growing roots and has certainly put his all into production even if, for someone whose previous experience was in marketing, he has been surprisingly slow on the sales side. He has yet to sell his first vintage, 2009, and the next three vintages sit in various small tanks and casks in a barn. But he and his accomplice Serge Mazet could not be faulted for ingenuity.
From his four hectares of vines they apparently reject so many grapes as substandard that they proudly count production in litres rather than hectolitres, and yet they have managed to make no fewer than seven different wines from the 2009 vintage, with names such as L’Extravagante and L’Elliptique, and plan more for successive vintages. As Serre put it defiantly, “I make wine for me, not for others.” Mazet quickly corrected this bold statement by adding, “but to share”.
Part of the reason for their lack of interest in sales effort is clearly because the two of them have so enjoyed the viticulture and vinification, experimenting with techniques far more intricate than their neighbours’. The results are undoubtedly much richer and later-picked than the average Corbières. But would I think of buying one of their mixed cases of a dozen bottles at €2,000, however beautifully presented? Not for one minute.
This is just one example of the many brand new wine enterprises today that seem powered by the belief that more is more, particularly with regard to launch prices. My jaw dropped recently when researching the background to a new wine from Australia, Thousand Candles. This is an unusual Shiraz-dominated blend from a single vineyard in the Yarra Valley outside Melbourne. It is made by William Downie, an early and gifted member of the admirable new wave of young winemakers determined to produce wines very different from the high-octane Shirazes that used to represent the Australian mainstream.
Also involved is Paul Henry, a skilled marketeer who was at one stage in charge of presenting Australian wine generically to the outside world. Perhaps it was he who advised an attention-grabbing release price of A$100 (about £60) for the first, 2011, vintage – admittedly one of Australia’s wettest ever. Downie, a Pinot Noir enthusiast, is a fan of whole bunch fermentation, a controversial Burgundian technique which involves including all the stems in the fermentation vat. The 2012 is much better but Thousand Candles 2011 tastes like a pastiche of this style, threaded through with the green stemmy character of an underripe vintage and real tartness. Henry quite rightly describes it as “a Marmite wine that people will either love or hate”. This is certainly a wine that will be talked about, and there is a faction that presents ambitious pricing as a virtue, bravely establishing the fact that Australia can produce wines with sky-high prices too.
But, while I would be the last to condone the stratospheric prices of France’s most expensive wines, Bordeaux’s first growths being the most obvious examples, they at least have a track record proved over nearly two centuries. It has also been demonstrated that these wines can mature for decades, and there is a well-established secondary market for them.
L’Indomptable, a rather tough Carignan, is priced at €164 at Vins et Vinos, 38 rue Barbès, 11000 Carcassonne, France; www.vinsvinos.com. Per bottle that is.
A decade or so ago someone opportunistically tried to convince investors that a portfolio of unknown Australian wines was a good bet. It all went horribly wrong. But with Thousand Candles, everything fell into place when I discovered it is primarily aimed at the Asian market, and that total production is only 650 dozen-bottle cases. Rarity can be used to justify high prices, up to a point, but there is huge variation in different markets’ reaction to high prices.
Although the Chinese economy may not sustain this, there have until now been enough well-heeled Chinese wine buyers to encourage producers to aim for the sky with prices. In a market as relatively inexperienced as most Asian ones there is widespread, if misplaced, belief in a direct correlation between price and quality.
The same has been true for the massive wave of new American wine enthusiasts. The recovering US economy has sustained Napa Valley Cabernets as some of the most expensive wines on the planet. And only last week I was emailed by the admirable sommelier-turned-wine-producer Rajat Parr about his new Central Coast venture Domaine de la Côte ($90 for the top bottling). “I will be in touch soon to let you know your specific allocation,” he assured me, and presumably everyone else on his mailing list. European producers selling to hardened, price-sensitive buyers on their side of the Atlantic would kill to be able to use this technique.
The joke is that wine is not very expensive to make. Production costs of even the grandest red bordeaux are rarely more than €10 a bottle, €30 at most if the château is run on bank borrowings.
And, as for the specially fashioned “icon” bottlings pulled out of a hat by so many new-world producers nowadays, don’t get me started – except to repeat the comment, “Icon: is that one word or two?”
Read more at JancisRobinson.com
Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.