© The Financial Times Ltd 2016
FT and 'Financial Times' are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
The Financial Times and its journalists are subject to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice.
May 23, 2014 1:05 pm
I seem to be asked more and more often to recommend wines to lay down for newborn babies, preferably dated with the relevant birth year. This is presumably a result of wine’s increasing popularity as a leisure interest around the world – perhaps encouraged by the legion of salespeople who have been trying to position wine as an attractive financial investment.
I find I am quite often asked to recommend wines made in a certain year even months before the grapes are picked. Many new parents are so thrilled by the idea of starting a cellar for their progeny that they forget that it is generally necessary to wait at least until the baby’s first or ideally even second birthday before making a well-informed decision.
Most parents suggest that the chosen wine or wines should ideally be good to drink from about its, and the baby’s, 18th birthday (21st in the US) and ideally for many years after that. This limits the choice considerably. The vast majority of bottles on sale are past their best at two or three years old. It is no accident that the classic godfather’s liquid gift was a pipe of port. A pipe is the equivalent of 550 litres, or 733 bottles, surely too much for even the thirstiest port enthusiast. But vintage port, the sort of port that carries just the name of a shipper and a vintage and is released at just under two years old, has the great advantage of lasting longer than almost any other sort of wine. In fact it is a pity to open a bottle at under 20 years old and vintage port can easily be in its prime at 50 or even 60 – just like a newborn.
Those on a budget and in more of a hurry may like to consider the little brothers of vintage port, so-called single quinta ports, wines made from a single year like vintage port, but from a single one of the top farms, or quintas, rather than the tiptop blend assembled by a shipper. These wines, generally less than half the price of a vintage port, are likely to be at their best at about 20 to 25 years old. Single quinta ports have been put on the market much later than vintage port, with vintages 1998 to 2001 currently available on the market, but the British shippers have just started to offer the 2012s as futures.
The other obvious choice is red bordeaux. Top-quality examples are designed to last for decades, although unfortunately nature has been rather unco-operative in recent vintages. The last really successful red bordeaux vintage was 2010 (my divisible-by-five rule has been working nicely) but it was priced sky-high. Really skilled cherry-picking is required to identify the red bordeaux from the 2011, 2012 and 2013 vintages that will provide delicious drinking two decades from now.
I reckon sweet white bordeaux would be a great choice for laying down for a newborn because these wines, unlike their red counterparts, are underpriced and can last even longer. But you do need to go for a blue-chip producer to be sure.
Red burgundy, as always, is much more of a minefield – and prices in recent vintages have been zooming up, particularly for the elite wines that are most likely to last at least two decades. And until we have incontrovertible proof that the premature oxidation problem has been solved, I would not recommend anyone choose white burgundy for long-term storage.
Still in France, Hermitage both red and white would be a fine choice for long-term cellaring. The best easily last 20 years; I am enjoying some from the 1980s at the moment.
If you are looking for a demonstrably long-lived white wine, look no further than fine Riesling, perhaps a classic wine from the Mosel that may be light in alcohol but will have no shortage of flavour. With time, the fruit develops real complexity and tastes less sweet, while the wine will always be high in refreshing acidity. And, who knows? Having observed the cyclical nature of fashions in wine, I think it is perfectly possible that light whites will be regarded as extremely smart in 2034.
Italy’s great long-lived Barolo and Barbaresco would be obvious choices for extended cellaring, and the vintages’ reputations are usefully different from those of Bordeaux and northern Portugal. Then there is great, classical rioja, which also follows a different vintage pattern. But there are sometimes years when it seems as though the whole of Europe has been blighted. Our son had the misfortune to be born in 1984, for instance, so we had to look to California and some of its finest Cabernets to lay down for him. (They are still in great shape.)
As for southern hemisphere wines, however impressive many of them can be, only a handful have a track record of ageing majestically over decades. Penfolds’ top bottlings such as Grange are the most obvious example but Henschke’s Hill of Grace and Mount Edelstone have earned their spurs, and are being chased by rather fewer collectors around the world.
Tasting notes on Purple Pages of JancisRobinson.com
Stockists from wine-searcher.com
Suggestions for recent birth years
Many of the wines will not be available for some time. Where I have made specific suggestions, I have given average prices per bottle as listed on winesearcher.com. I’m sorry they are relatively high, but cheap wine is just not worth keeping for decades. If you want to personalise your choice, you can put the name of your child into the search box of winesearcher.com and see what comes up.
It is far too early to have any idea of the likely quality of wines produced in the northern hemisphere. The vines have not even flowered, although vintages ending in 4 have rarely been particularly successful cellar candidates in Europe. 2004 Rioja Reservas are exceptions.
A difficult vintage for much of Europe but successes include sweet white bordeaux (albeit a lighter vintage than some) and, probably, Barolo and Barbaresco. This was another good vintage for California too. It is still far too early to buy suitable Italian or California wines but you could buy Sauternes such as Ch Suduiraut £40; Ch Climens £36; Ch Coutet £30
California had a great vintage, unlike Europe’s. A well-chosen California Cabernet should last decades. Top-quality rioja or Rhône would work too. Very few top California wines have been released but Ridge, Monte Bello £87 would be an irreproachable choice. Great classic rioja such as Reservas from CVNE, López de Heredia and La Rioja Alta may not be available for a decade. Or try Clos des Papes Châteauneuf-du-Pape £52
The obvious choice here is vintage port. The 2011s are some of the most glorious ever made. (Taylor, Fonseca, Graham, Quinta do Noval, Niepoort £50-60; Cockburn £44). If you insist on a dry wine, consider a top north Rhône (eg Chapoutier, Ermitage Le Méal £106). But this was a difficult vintage for Australia, California and much of Europe.
Red bordeaux is the obvious choice but the top wines are ridiculously expensive. Seek out the (many) less glamorous names with a likely long life. You could also try Barolo, the 2010s are just becoming available, or a top-quality sweet German which may outlast the lot of them.
● Vieux Château Certan £225
● Chx Haut Bailly, Léoville Poyferré, £103
● Ch Smith Haut Lafitte £91
● Ch St Pierre £65
● Ch Phelan Ségur £33
● Ch Sociando Mallet £28
Barolo (as tasted so far)
● Vietti, Lazzarito £97
● Aldo Conterno, Bussia £37
● Giacomo Fenocchio, Villero £30
To comment on this article please post below, or email firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2016. You may share using our article tools.
Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.