- •Contact us
- •About us
- •Advertise with the FT
- •Terms & conditions
© The Financial Times Ltd 2013 FT and 'Financial Times' are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
February 1, 2013 7:11 pm
Look at any guide to investing in wine and it will tell you that you can’t go wrong if you buy the best, in particular the first growths of bordeaux. But that advice is now thoroughly out of date. The most recent heavily hyped vintage was 2009, an especially ripe year that required remarkably little effort on the part of the grower and winemaker, resulting in unusually concentrated, alcoholic wines. Encouraged by the high scores meted out by American guru Robert Parker, the Bordelais asked for record prices for their 2009s, with first growths released at five-digit prices in pounds per dozen bottles. The Chinese, many of them with zero experience of the wine market, bought heavily, as did some investment funds.
The theory is that once the prices (but not wines) are released, after the famous en primeur tastings, then they steadily rise, providing a nice return for investors. But for the first time since the overpriced 1997 vintage was released, prices for 2009s have actually fallen since release. This is not meant to happen for vintages of this calibre. Prices for 1997 fell because it was a very ordinary vintage but, bolstered by unprecedented demand for the much better 1995s and 1996s, the Bordelais thought (wrongly) they could introduce another price hike. But 2009 is unequivocally a good quality vintage. The problem was, again, overpricing. Demand from Asia gave the Bordelais the confidence to ask for steep prices for the top 2009s (and 2010s) but investors have been left with a nasty taste as they have watched prices soften.
Of course, the economic climate hasn’t helped but the real problem has been with the first growths. The London-based fine wine trading platform Liv-ex prepared a graph that tracked the average price of 45 top red 2009s since release. It showed that, even having rallied since hitting bottom last September, the average price is still about 3.5 per cent below release price. Separating out the different categories, however, the top wines have fallen in value more dramatically than the rest. The left bank (Médoc and Graves) first growths – Châteaux Lafite, Mouton, Latour, Margaux and Haut-Brion – have fallen by 17 per cent on average and the top wines of the right bank (St-Emilion and Pomerol) by 3 per cent, while over the same period since early summer 2010 the other smarter wines have on average risen by about 7 per cent on the left bank and almost 10 per cent on the right. That’s more like it!
Part of the problem was that the Chinese in particular wildly overvalued Château Lafite, which achieved near-mythical status in China for a while, inflating the average first-growth price. Another contributory factor is that, especially on retasting the wines once bottled, Robert Parker appeared to scatter 100-point scores like confetti. Score-conscious investors realised they didn’t have to spend first-growth sums in order to secure a 100-point wine. Since even the best wines in the next rank down, the so-called super seconds, cost less than half as much as the first growths, this helped to soften first-growth prices.
How do the 2009s taste today? A group of three wine writers and up to 16 wine merchants meet every January in the Suffolk seaside town of Southwold for a three-day immersion in the vintage that went into bottle 18 months before. Recently retired bordeaux négociant Bill Blatch somehow manages to source examples of every single significant wine and several other associated ones that are less important – well over 250 in all, including the top whites, both sweet and dry. Most importantly, we all taste blind, comparing like with like – usually calling on a second bottle if we think there may be a problem.
With all this ripeness, and alcohol levels stated on the label (which were probably a little less than actual strengths) from 13 per cent up to 15.5 per cent for some right bank wines, these 2009s could have been very tiring to taste. But the best were beautifully balanced and, notably from Pomerol, Pauillac and Sauternes, provided some of the greatest pleasure I can remember at a Southwold bordeaux tasting.
Early showings elsewhere of the 2009 crus bourgeois, the less starry wines of the Médoc, were impressive. I suspected this would be an early drinking vintage that would exhibit much more consistency than many and, unlike most bordeaux vintages, might not retreat into a shell as it evolves in bottle. But few of the “lesser” Médocs we tasted (which, admittedly, were weighted heavily in favour of properties there owned by highly ranked châteaux to the south) were thrilling, although the best offer good value. And some wines, notably the consistent and impressive reds of St-Julien, seem more marked by their structure than their fruit – more concentration than just ripeness – whereas the Pauillacs were in general much sweeter.
As usual, St-Emilions and Margaux varied enormously but the excesses of over-oaking and overripeness are less evident than in the early years of this century. The Pessac-Léognan reds, which usually score highly for their extra freshness, didn’t this year. And the dry whites, which came mainly from the same appellation (although more and more fancy bordeaux châteaux have planted white wine grapes on their less satisfactory land and are trying to sell expensive whites too), in general lacked a bit of fruit in the middle – perhaps because they had to be picked so early as acidity levels plummeted.
There were one or two wines, of both colours, that tasted as though they had been acidified, as is routine in so many wine regions outside Europe. (It is perfectly legal in France so long as the same lot of wine is not chaptalised – or, has sugar added to bolster alcohol. No one would have dreamt of chaptalising in 2009.)
At the very end, when we were reviewing all three days’ tastings, one senior wine merchant fixed the younger ones with a beady eye and dared to ask, “Are you proud to have sold these wines which proved overpriced?” No substantive answer was forthcoming. We moved swiftly on to how much we are looking forward to retasting the lovely and less flamboyant 2010s in a year’s time.
See tasting notes on JancisRobinson.com
(with average per bottle prices according to winesearcher.com)
RIGHT BANK REDS
• Larmande, St-Emilion, £24
• Tertre Daugay, St-Emilion, £23
• Esprit de l’Eglise, Pomerol, £26
• Rol Valentin, St-Emilion, £28
LEFT BANK REDS
• Fourcas Borie, Listrac-Médoc, £15
• Gazin Rocquencourt, Pessac-Léognan, £18
• Haut Beauséjour, St-Estèphe, £19
• Moulin Riche, St-Julien, £22
• La Louvière, Pessac-Léognan, £22
• Pavillon de Poyferré, St-Julien, £26
• Branas Grand Poujeaux, Moulis-en-Médoc, £26
• Ormes de Pez, St-Estèphe, £26
• Cos Labory, St-Estèphe, £26
• Angludet, Margaux, £26
• Lynch Moussas, Pauillac, £28
• de Fieuzal, Pessac-Léognan, £29
• Phelan Ségur, St-Estèphe, £32
• Lafon Rochet, St-Estèphe, £36
• Haut Marbuzet, St-Estèphe, £35
• Boyd Cantenac, Margaux, £37
• Grand Village Blanc, Bordeaux, £8
• Haut Bergey, Pessac-Léognan, £25
• Filhot, Sauternes, £25
• Doisy Védrines, Sauternes, £29
• Rabaud Promis, Sauternes, £31
• Lafaurie Peyraguey, Sauternes, £39
For stockists see winesearcher.com
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2013. You may share using our article tools.
Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.