© The Financial Times Ltd 2016
FT and 'Financial Times' are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
The Financial Times and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice.
May 28, 2013 12:34 pm
The taxman is knocking at another Silicon Valley door. Just when thousands of urbanites thought they discovered a gold mine in renting out their apartments on Airbnb, regulators and tax collectors are flexing their power.
The online peer-to-peer home rental sites such as Airbnb have shot to popularity in recent years and are now facing policy battles in cities around the world where local laws limit short-term rentals.
|Read for free|
|If you enjoy news analysis like this, register today on FT.com to see up to eight free stories a month|
“It’s the wave of the future, and I think it’s a good thing for the city ultimately, but it needs some regulation,” said Paul Utrecht, a landlord-tenant attorney in San Francisco. “It should be legalised and it should be taxed.”
At the urging of the hotel industry in some cases, politicians and courts are examining the ways in which Airbnb, Vacation Rentals By Owner, and other short-term rental sites run foul of local residency and zoning laws – and may be evading local taxes.
An Airbnb host in New York was fined $2,400 this week when an administrative law judge determined it had violated a city law that prohibits rentals for less than 30 days. Airbnb called the legal reasoning “tortured” and has vowed to aid with an appeal.
Barcelona and Berlin are debating new laws that limit short-term rentals, while other European cities, such as Paris, enforce onerous licensing requirements.
Officials in San Francisco are among the first in the world drafting new legislation that softens restrictions and adds a tax to such rentals. On top of income taxes, they want amateur hosts to pay the same 14 per cent hotel tax that the Hiltons and Marriotts do.
“When visitors come to San Francisco, they incur significant costs for police, fire, health, street cleaning, and transit,” said David Chiu, president of the city’s board of supervisors. “Just as we ask our hotels to pay the hotel tax to pay for these city expenses, I think it’s appropriate to ask Airbnb hosts to do the same.”
Airbnb is in close discussions with the city on the legislation. Other stakeholders involved in the negotiations report the company seems to be acknowledging that it will have to agree to pay some tax, but believe it will push for a lower rate than the current 14 per cent.
“For us, we’re already paying taxes toward the city: property tax, sales tax anytime I buy something,” said Quynh Yamada, a San Francisco nurse who rents her two-bedroom apartment on Airbnb during the summer. “I don’t see why I have to pay extra.”
Last year, Ms Yamada made about $20,000 through Airbnb, money she put towards the cost of her mortgage and a surprise $30,000 bill to replace all the siding on her house.
San Francisco has not estimated the revenue such rentals could yield in hotel taxes, but it is enough that its investigators are tracking online sites to identify the most successful renters to target for collection.
In the meantime, politicians elsewhere are still grappling with basic regulation and, in some cases, increasing pressure from citizen groups and a hotel industry that feels threatened by the growth of online peer-to-peer rentals.
In New Orleans, Kristen Gisleson Palmer, a city council member who represents the heavily visited French Quarter, said she has “begged” her administration to “crack down” on short-term rentals in the city, particularly in areas that are strictly zoned for residential use.
Local law prohibits the rental of rooms for less than 30 days without a hotel or bed and breakfast licence, and less than 60 days in the French Quarter, but she said the city has not been enforcing the law and residents are complaining of noise and garbage generated by an over-run of tourists.
“These short-term rentals are really eroding the residential nature of our neighbourhoods,” she said. “It has to stop.”
In European cities like Paris, Barcelona, Berlin and Hamburg, officials are worried that landlords will buy up buildings specifically to rent to tourists through these online sites, drying up the housing supply for residents and inflating rents, said Stephan Uhrenbacher, chief executive of 9flats, a rental site based in Germany. He said some cities present a “tough legal environment”, often made worse by a vocal hotel lobby.
“They fear us,” he said. “I would welcome any initiative where we are subject to the same taxes, because that would make us a real partner to the city and we would be taken seriously.”
In San Francisco, some residents are being evicted by landlords who then convert the buildings to short-term rental units to avoid complying with the city’s tenant laws and because they can make more money renting to tourists through Airbnb or VRBO, said Ted Gullicksen, director of the San Francisco Tenants’ Union.
“It was the proliferation of these websites that has brought the tourist use to an epidemic level,” he said.
All these efforts have kept David Hantman very busy. The head of global public policy for Airbnb is constantly flying off to lobby government officials around the world, with recent efforts centred on New York, San Francisco and Paris.
He argues that the majority of its hosts are average people looking to make ends meet. Mr Hantman also highlights the economic impact report it commissioned for San Francisco, showing that Airbnb guests stay in the city longer than hotel guests and spend more money at local businesses, particularly those that do not usually see tourist traffic.
“It’s a new enough paradigm that governments don’t know what to do yet,” Mr Hantman said.
Airbnb also joined forces with other rental sites HomeAway, TripAdvisor and FlipKey to form the Short Term Rental Advocacy Center, a group that tracks and influences the development and reform of local legislation and tax laws around the US.
“This is a big new business and Airbnb has clearly adopted the strategy that they’ll just violate the law and hope they get a big enough market and a big enough voter base that they can change it,” Mr Utrecht said.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2016. You may share using our article tools.
Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.
Sign up for email briefings to stay up to date on topics you are interested in