© The Financial Times Ltd 2016 FT and 'Financial Times' are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
February 7, 2014 6:44 pm
A few weeks ago, when discussion of sexual relations in the UK workplace reached fever pitch (thanks in part to the Lord Rennard affair), I spent three days as the only woman closeted in a room with 19 male co-workers. I do this every January – a total immersion in the bordeaux vintage harvested three and a bit years before – and I have to say that my fellow tasters, always exclusively male, are increasingly well behaved, perhaps as we all get older. Not only am I well past the age of a flirty run around a filing cabinet but the least sexually politically correct members of the original tasting team are, alas, no longer with us. The younger tasters, all members of the posh end of the British wine trade, are much less likely than their predecessors to compare the wines we’re tasting with women – although from time to time we do hear the phrase favoured by the late Bill Baker of Reid Wines, “tart’s wine”, particularly when tasting the lesser St-Émilions.
In an upper room of Southwold’s Crown Hotel on the Suffolk coast, we blind tasted a total of 328 bordeaux 2010s – far more than usual, in deference to the vintage’s reputation. The previous year we had succumbed to the flashy, super-ripe charms of 2009. Both before and immediately after bottling, the 2010s had also shown extremely well, albeit with decidedly more framework for their flesh than the 2009s. At the end of the three days, having tasted all the most respected wines of both colours and even more of the lesser ones, some of our group expressed mild disappointment that the 2010s seemed to be exhibiting less obvious charm and class than had been expected. But I am still extremely optimistic about this vintage. In general, it has real concentration and the best have a heavy charge of beautifully ripe tannins. The 2009s are much easier to love at this early stage but I think the better 2010s will eventually provide great drinking.
The finest wines – the first growths and equivalents – really are wonderful by any measure. Their prices are so high nowadays that their owners can afford to make the strictest selections, so I fully expect them to manage to make respectably superior wines even from the poor hand dealt by nature in 2013, albeit in relatively tiny quantities. But they cost so much more than wines just one layer down in bordeaux’s pecking order, the top second growths and equivalents (£6,000 to £9,000 a dozen bottles rather than £800 to £2,000), that one of the keys to finding the best buys of any bordeaux vintage is to identify the best performers at this level – those capable of giving the first growths a run for their money. In recent vintages Château Pichon Longueville has been one obviously reliable candidate, as has Château Cos d’Estournel (with the exception of its rather odd 2009 vintage).
But these recent tastings confirmed that there is value to be had in 2010 bordeaux much lower down the scale. Unlike 2009, this is not a vintage so chock full of fruit that even the most basic wines have a certain appeal. Many of the second wines made at smart addresses are disappointingly weedy – as though all the scrawny, underripe fruit was chucked in. And the same is true of some of the lesser classed growths, those wines that rely for sales on the fact that they are fifth growths or whatever. But I noticed a marked contrast between them and the most ambitious of the crus bourgeois, the châteaux in the Médoc that are not classed growths, but have to apply each year on the basis of that year’s wine, for cru bourgeois status. You might call them the try-harder brigade. Some of these can offer seriously good value (see my recommendations).
I should qualify that comment about second wines. There is a world of difference between a wine such as Écho de Lynch Bages, which is a second wine in the pure sense of being a repository for wine that did not make it into the (very respectable) grand vin Château Lynch Bages, and Les Forts de Latour, a wine produced in the same cellars as the grand vin of first growth Château Latour but from specific plots assigned to the production of Les Forts. Les Forts de Latour 2010 is one of the most impressive wines of the vintage but is priced accordingly.
In general on the left bank, Margaux was – yet again – the most disappointing appellation, while St-Julien and St-Estèphe both produced stunning wines. The Pauillacs seemed more wildly varied than usual. Of course, with three first growths, Pauillac fielded some of the most glorious wines of all – but also some of the weediest.
On the right bank, the lesser St-Émilions seem to be slowly improving with every vintage, with fewer pastiches of overripe fruit and under-seasoned oak in evidence. Pomerol next door produced a host of delicious 2010s, not all of them from the top drawer.
Two of the most disappointing flights were those devoted to dry white bordeaux, a category of which many of us had such high hopes when the wines were shown en primeur in April 2011. Some of them tasted like a throwback to a pre-technological age (why does Château Talbot in St-Julien bother to make a dry white?). The better sweet white bordeaux 2010, on the other hand, from those châteaux that can afford to make a real selection of the best fruit, were exceptionally luscious.
Talk of sweet wines inspires mention of “the ladies” in a certain quarter. My contribution to the sexual politics debate is that I would like to ask each of my 19 fellow tasters, from a range of the most respected fine-wine merchants in the UK, whether they genuinely believe they are a better taster than any woman who works for their company. Perhaps next year, when they’ve reflected on their answers, they might consider giving some of the many talented younger women in the wine business a break and some additional experience and send someone along to bump up the distaff side.
Tasting notes on Purple Pages of JancisRobinson.com
Stockists from winesearcher.com
Best Value 2010 Bordeaux
Prices given are very approximate: the international average price per bottle (often minus taxes) according to wine-searcher.com, which also cites retailers. Particularly good buys are asterisked.
● L’Enclos, Pomerol, £31
● Quinault l’Enclos, St-Émilion, £24
● Haut Bergey, Pessac-Léognan, £31
● *De Fieuzal, Pessac-Léognan, £30
● *Deyrem Valentin, Margaux, £18
● Croizet Bages, Pauillac, £24
● *Phélan Ségur, St-Estèphe, £33
● Tronquoy Lalande, St-Estèphe, £30
● Haut Marbuzet, St-Estèphe, £30
● Cos Labory, St-Estèphe, £29
● *Capbern Gasqueton, St-Estèphe, £16
● Sociando Mallet, Haut-Médoc, £27
● Belgrave, Haut-Médoc, £26
● Chasse Spleen, Haut-Médoc, £24
● De Camensac, Haut-Médoc, £20
● Lestage, Listrac-Médoc, £18
● *Fourcas Borie, Listrac-Médoc, £13
● Bel Orme Tronquoy de Lalande, Haut-Médoc, £15
● De Lamarque, Haut-Médoc, £12
● *Malescasse, Haut-Médoc, £12
● Tour St Bonnet, Médoc, £11
● Beaumont, Haut-Médoc, £11
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2016. You may share using our article tools.
Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.