Financial Times FT.com

Sharper cuts and higher taxes forecast

By Nicholas Timmins, Public Policy Editor

Published: October 13 2009 03:00 | Last updated: October 13 2009 03:00

An incoming government will not only need to cut spending much more sharply than currently planned but will almost certainly also have to raise additional taxes, according to an analysis by PwC, the professional services group.

John Hawksworth, PwC's head of macroeconomics, was less optimistic than the government about the speed of a likely recovery from the recession and believed the next administration should aim to balance the budget by 2015-16 - two years earlier than Gordon Brown, prime minister, is proposing. That meant finding an additional £26bn of spending cuts or tax rises by 2013-14, when the next spending review ended.

The move was needed to reduce the risk that international investors would want higher interest rates on the UK's growing levels of public debt - and to build a buffer against a future recession, he said.

"We have been able to survive this major economic shock by throwing money at it," Mr Hawksworth said. "But who is to say in 10 years it won't happen again? So we should be planning to get back into surplus so that we have some money to throw at it, rather than ratcheting up the total of debt each time."

From 2020, the UK would also face higher costs from an ageing population: "You want to be in a strong position then to start meeting the pay-as-you-go benefits that will have to be paid".

The extra £26bn of fiscal tightening by 2013-14 could be met by tax rises or spending cuts. Taking it all from tax could damage growth. But taking it all from spending would produce "draconian" cuts - a 23 per cent reduction over three years in departmental spending if the health budget was protected.

A mix of tax rises and spending cuts "may be the most realistic" option, he said. A 50/50 split between tax and spending would still require cumulative cuts of 13 per cent in spending, or 18 per cent if health was protected - larger than the 9 per cent and 13 per cent likely on the government's current plans. But it would also require "significant rises" in the tax take of around £13bn, with income tax, national insurance or VAT likely targets.

More in this section

Banks in victory on overdraft charges

Bank charges – what does the ruling mean for you?

Prudential withdraws from equity release market

Lloyds launches £13.5bn rights issue

UK banks face up to 8m claims

Flood claims rise towards £100m mark

Private banks seek home loan cash deposits

Fixed-rate bonds stop rewarding savers

Signs of life in buy-to-let market

‘Trail’ commission sparks debate

Riskier high-yield debt draws attention

Jobs and classifieds

Jobs

Search
Type your search criteria below:

Executive Director

Harvard Shanghai Center

Global Head of Aftersales

Material Handling Capital Equipment

Chief Executive Officer

Financial Services Group

Deputy Finance Director

Department for Work and Pensions

Recruiters

FT.com can deliver talented individuals across all industries around the world

Post a job now