Financial Times FT.com

A wildness of colour and fleeting romances

By Jackie Wullschlager

Published: February 23 2007 02:00 | Last updated: February 23 2007 02:00

In 1918 Renoir, fragile, swathed in bandages, too crippled by arthritis to hold a brush and with just a year to live, received a visit of homage from 48-year-old Matisse. The younger artist enquired about buying a painting; Renoir resp-onded with the offer of exchanging canvases. "I'm truly touched, but I can't accept," replied Matisse, then at the height of his powers. "I'm not worth it."

History has turned this verdict round. Today, Renoir, with his pulpy girls and party scenes, is a sugary crowd-puller, Matisse a father of modern art. Yet until the 1940s, Renoir's radiant, painterly painting was regarded as the unrivalled height of Impressionism, with taste-setters such as Kenneth Clark rating him above both Monet and Manet.

You have viewed your allowance of free articles. If you wish to view more, click the button below.

Read this