Financial Times FT.com

Not a true picture of access to crucial treatment

Published: June 23 2008 03:00 | Last updated: June 23 2008 03:00

From Dr Tim Reed.

Sir, The Access to Medicines Index (Reports, June 16) was presented as the sober and considered approach amidst the extremities of the pharmaceutical industry and the non-governmental organisation sector. However, the weakness inherent in the design was entirely disregarded.

The ‘on paper’ codes and procedures declared by the pharmaceutical companies themselves formed the bulk of the data while crucial data from local consumers –patients in developing countries – was overlooked. Without understanding the impact and effectiveness of the pharmaceutical corporate social responsibility policies on the ground, the value of the index is, at best, debatable.

Furthermore, despite doing more to improve access to essential medicines for the world's poor through lowering drug prices, generic manufacturers languish nearer the bottom of the list. When five bigbrand pharmaceutical companies take the top spots in this independent index, it is only natural to question the methods.

Tim Reed,
Director of HAI Global,
Health Action International,
1054 HK Amsterdam,
The Netherlands

More in this section

‘Alpha’ invented to justify fees

Clear examples of the capitalist state at work

Don’t shoot! The message is at fault

Much-touted prosperity of the west was fake

UN can and must lead in shaping new framework

To think I blamed bankers and traders

Business cycle may have been the driver

1929 crisis did not lead to war

We're all doomed

Don’t blame the rocket scientists of the banking sector for the global crunch

The advent of Athenian democracy depended on more than silver find

Jobs and classifieds

Jobs

Search
Type your search criteria below:

Chief Executive

Gloucestershire First

Finance Director

Junction - BGL Group

Recruiters

FT.com can deliver talented individuals across all industries around the world

Post a job now