Last updated: November 18, 2012 11:25 pm

US tax breaks worth $150bn face axe

  • Share
  • Print
  • Clip
  • Gift Article
  • Comments

Corporate tax breaks worth more than $150bn over a decade could be threatened in US budget negotiations, if lawmakers choose to adopt a flurry of White House proposals to boost revenues from business in order to reach a deal.

Talks to avert the fiscal cliff – a $600bn combination of tax rises and spending cuts that could tip the US economy into recession if Congress cannot agree to stop them – are moving into higher gear in the wake of the first White House summit on Friday between President Barack Obama and leaders in Congress.

Democrats are insisting on new revenue – and Republicans have said that they could accept higher taxes under certain conditions.

But while most of the discussion has focused on extracting higher levies from the individual side of the tax code, especially from the wealthiest Americans, some corporate tax provisions are also in the firing line.

Some of these tax preferences could be trimmed in a two-step agreement, which is the likely framework for a deal that includes a downpayment on deficit reduction upfront, including new revenues, before instructions for broader tax and spending reform are set for 2013.

Business tax breaks may be particularly vulnerable if Congress looks to them as part of a package of measures to avoid “sequestration” – the automatic reductions in the budgets of US government agencies, including a big slice out of the Pentagon.

In depth: US fiscal cliff

US Capitol

The White House and Congressional leaders are embarking on high-stakes talks to avoid a looming fiscal cliff

Mr Obama met with a group of US chief executives last week to discuss the fiscal cliff talks, and on his way to Thailand over the weekend called a number of his traditional allies in the business community to discuss the need for a “balanced deficit reduction solution”, according to a White House official. Mr Obama phoned Warren Buffett, the billionaire investor, Tim Cook of Apple, Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan, Jim McNerney of Boeing and Craig Jelinek of Costco, the official said.

Many chief executives say they would be willing to sacrifice some of their favoured tax breaks in exchange for sweeping corporate tax reform in 2013 that would lower the tax rate from its current level of 35 per cent – one of the highest in the developed world.

But they would be deeply disappointed if some of their tax preferences were limited pre-emptively, before the corporate tax reform process gets under way.

“Any significant tax code changes should only be made within the context of comprehensive tax reform,” said Matt Miller, vice-president for tax and fiscal policy at the Business Roundtable, the executive lobby group. “It’s necessary to preserve any corporate tax base-broadening for the bigger deal on tax reform.

Among the tax preferences at risk include $28bn in deductions benefiting fossil fuel companies, including oil, gas and coal companies. Another is a special accounting method known as “last in, first out”, used for inventory valuation by manufacturers and distribution companies, which if repealed would save $77bn for the US government.

The application of low capital gains tax rates to private equity, hedge fund, venture capital and real estate profits – known as carried interest – could also be curtailed, for a $13bn gain to federal coffers. Favourable depreciation rules for corporate jet owners and tax benefits on corporate life insurance policies, worth nearly $18bn, could also be limited or eliminated.

Some of these provisions were already on the chopping block in failed budget negotiations last year, meaning they could be quickly dusted off again.

But Republicans on Capitol Hill are the most likely to object to raising revenue from corporate tax breaks in the fiscal cliff talks. “Some of those business provisions spur investment in manufacturing in America,” Kevin Brady, a senior Republican on the Ways and Means committee, the tax-writing panel in the House of Representatives, told the FT. “Cherry picking a few tax provisions here and there both on the individual and the corporate side makes it more difficult to do tax reform down the road,” he said.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2015. You may share using our article tools.
Please don't cut articles from and redistribute by email or post to the web.

  • Share
  • Print
  • Clip
  • Gift Article
  • Comments


Sign up for email briefings to stay up to date on topics you are interested in

Enter job search